{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105843", "time_of_filling": "2023-10-03 09:45:27", "domain_names": [ "arrcelormitttal.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "ARCELORMITTAL" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "jana grunewald" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/strong> The Complainant states that it is a major steel producing company, active worldwide, and the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging. The Complainant further states that it is the owner of the Complainant’s Trademark and of various domain names, such as the domain name <arcelormittal.com> (since January 27, 2006). The disputed domain name was registered on September 19, 2023. The domain name resolves to a parking page with commercial links. Furthermore, the Complainant states that MX servers are configured.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.The Respondent never filed any administratively compliant response. The Center received an email dated October 17, 2023 from Dr. iur. Elmar S. Hohmann stating that: “Dear Sir or Madam,  with your enclosed letter dated 04.10.2023 you have requested Dr. Jana Grünewald to participate in a conciliation on procedure. The domain arrcelormitttal.com is unknown to Dr. Grünewald. If you call this up, there are also no references to Dr. Grünewald.First of all, please state in what way there should be a connection on between the aforementioned domain and Dr. Grünewald.With kind regardsDr. iur. Elmar S. Hohmann“The Center replied to this email on the same day, October 17, 2023, but never received any reply.NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.The Panel cannot accept the contentions sent via email which are specified above, because the sender of this email is not a Respondent in this proceedings and did not provide CAC of any information about authorisation by the Respondent.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Bart Van Besien" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-10-28 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the international trademark “ArcelorMittal” (wordmark), no. 947686, registered on August 3, 2007, in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42, valid in various countries (hereinafter the “Trademark” or the “Complainant’s Trademark”). The Complainant also submitted evidence that it has registered the domain name <arcelormittal.com> on January 27, 2006.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "arrcelormitttal.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }