FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:
The Complainant, originally operated as a partnership among its owners, was incorporated in Delaware in January 2022, and has quickly established a reputation for leading research and applications of chat dialogs with artificial intelligence. By October 2022, the Complainant's AI chat platform had begun very fast growth, with 100,000 daily users and 300 million monthly messages. By March 2023, the chat volume handled by the Complainant's platform was up to 500 million messages per month. By May 2023, the Complainant's platform had served over 4 billion messages.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name was registered on May 16, 2023.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n
i) The Complainant has attained common law rights in the CHAI mark as a result of its extensive use of the mark for leading research and applications of chat dialogs with artificial intelligence since January 2022. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s mark CHAI.<\/p>\n
ii) The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name resolves to a website which has been evolving in sophistication over a period of months. The Respondent passes itself off as the Complainant. Displaying an obscure and unclear \"disclaimer\" suggests that the Respondent is making illegitimate use of the Complainant's mark to pass itself off as the Complainant and divert Complainant's customers.<\/p>\n
iii) The Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. The Respondent appears to have adopted the disputed domain name confusingly similar to the Complainant's mark for the purpose of passing itself off as the Complainant and advertising competitive products, while posting an obscure \"disclaimer\" which indicates the Respondent is perfectly well aware of the Complainant and its illicit use of the Complainant's mark.<\/p>\n
RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n
Respondent did not submit a response in this proceeding.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Mr. Ho-Hyun Nahm Esq." ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-11-17 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
Complainant has attained common law rights in the CHAI mark as a result of its extensive use of the mark for leading research and applications of chat dialogs with artificial intelligence since January 2022.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "CHAI-APP.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }