{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-105870", "time_of_filling": "2023-10-12 09:25:28", "domain_names": [ "saint-gobain.store" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "Ali Amin-Javaheri" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n

The Complainant states that it is a French company and a top industrial group in the world, with around 51.2 billion euros in turnover in 2022 and 168,000 employees producing, processing and distributing materials for the construction and industrial markets.<\/p>\n

The Complainant further states that it is the owner of the trademark “SAINT-GOBAIN” since the end of the 80's and of various domain names, such as the domain name <saint-gobain.com>. The disputed domain name was registered on October 23, 2019. The domain name resolves to a parking page with commercial links.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n

The Respondent replied after the deadline for substantiating its arguments in support of the registration of the disputed domain name through a brief e-mail, in which it is simply affirmed that <saint-gobain.store> would have been registered in accordance with a contract agreement between the Parties. However, no copy of a contract was provided.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Tommaso La Scala" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2023-11-19 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of several international trademark registrations for the wording “SAINT-GOBAIN”, including:<\/p>\n