{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106027", "time_of_filling": "2023-12-01 07:38:09", "domain_names": [ "remy-cointerau.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "REMY COINTREAU" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "cabinet bocuhara" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, REMY COINTREAU, is a company that operates in the production and the sale of cognacs, spirits and liqueurs.<\/p>\n

The Complainant is the owner of the trademark REMY COINTREAU, international word mark No. 895405, registered on July 27, 2006 in classes 32, 33 and 43.<\/p>\n

The Complainant is also the owner of the domain name <remy-cointreau.com>. <\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <r<\/span>emy-cointerau.com<\/span>> was registered on November 28, 2023<\/span> and resolves to a parking page with pay-per-click links.  <\/span><\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n

The Complainant considers the disputed domain name to be confusingly similar to a trademark in which it has rights.<\/p>\n

The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant, the Respondent is not known as the disputed domain name and not related in any way with the Complainant. The Complainant claims that he does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent.<\/p>\n

Finally, the Complainant considers that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant contends that the use of its trademark in the disputed domain name gives rise to the inference that the Respondent ought to have registered the disputed domain name for its trademark value. The Complainant further claims that the Respondent has attempted to attract Internet users to his own website thanks to the Complainant’s trademarks for its own commercial gain and that the disputed domain name has been used in a phishing scheme.

<\/p>\n

RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n

The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.  <\/span><\/div>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Flip Petillion" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-01-11 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the holder of several trademarks including the following:<\/p>\n

- REMY COINTREAU, international word mark No. 895405, registered on July 27, 2006 in classes 32, 33 and 43.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "remy-cointerau.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }