{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106086",
    "time_of_filling": "2023-12-21 12:01:13",
    "domain_names": [
        "eonnergy.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "E.ON SE"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Nicole Gerling (ARISTOS IP Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten mbB)",
    "respondent": [
        "Jack Li"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a European electric utility company based in Essen, Germany. Its E.ON and &ldquo;e.on&rdquo; marks are very well-known.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;eonnergy.com&gt; was registered on October 13, 2023. It resolves to a pay per click site containing links to energy providers and companies offering solar panels.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Alan Limbury"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-01-16 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant E.ON SE is the proprietor of numerous trademark registrations including the following:<\/p>\n<p><br \/>EUTM 002361558 E.ON, registered on 19\/12\/2002 in classes 35, 39 and 40;<br \/>EUTM 002362416 e.on, registered on 19\/12\/2002 in classes 35, 39 and 40; and<br \/>EUTM 006296529 e.on, registered on 27\/06\/2008 in classes 07, 36, 37 and 40.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "eonnergy.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}