{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106094", "time_of_filling": "2023-12-21 09:16:38", "domain_names": [ "gaumontauk.com", "gaumontcuk.com", "uksgaumont.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "GAUMONT" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "York New" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n

\n

The Complainant states that it is a French film studio company which is using GAUMONT as business name and distinctive sign at least since the early '90s of the past century.<\/p>\n

The Complainant further states that it is the owner of the trademark “GAUMONT” since 2008 and of the domain name <gaumont.com> since 1996.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain names were registered between October 1st and November 11th, 2023; two of them are currently inactive (<gaumontauk.com> and <uksgaumont.com>), while the 3rd one (<gaumontcuk.com>) redirects to a website featuring the Complainant’s GAUMONT trademark without authorization.<\/p>\n<\/div>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n

No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Tommaso La Scala" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-01-27 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of several international trademark registrations for the wording “SAINT-GOBAIN”, including:<\/p>\n