{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106119",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-01-02 11:14:30",
    "domain_names": [
        "finance-pentair.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Pentair Flow Services AG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "HSS IPM GmbH",
    "respondent": [
        "William  Simmons"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>According to the information provided by the registrar the disputed domain name &lt;finance-pentair.com&gt; was registered on 17 September 2023. &nbsp;&nbsp;<br \/><br \/>The disputed domain name does not resolve to an active website. In addition, MX records have been set up.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><br \/>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p>According to the information submitted by Complainant, Complainant is a business within the Pentair Group of companies (&ldquo;Pentair Group&rdquo;). Founded in 1966, the Pentair Group is a leader in the water industry, composed of companies around the world. The official website of Pentair Group is found at www.pentair.com. From approximately 135 locations in 26 countries, Pentair Group has more than 11,000 employees. Pentair Group&rsquo;s 2022 net sales were approximately $4.1 billion.<br \/><br \/>According to Complainant the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark. Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name directly and entirely incorporates Complainant&rsquo;s registered trademark PENTAIR along with the generic term &lsquo;&rsquo;finance&rsquo;&rsquo;, a term that can be considered related to Complainant&rsquo;s business. <br \/><br \/>According to Complainant, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. Respondent bears no relationship to Complainant and its trademarks, and the disputed domain name has no other meaning except for referring to Complainant&rsquo;s name and trademarks. Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, and further has never been authorized by Complainant to register the disputed domain name, nor does Complainant have any relationship with Respondent.<br \/><br \/>According to Complainant the disputed domain name is registered and is being used in bad faith. The disputed domain name is not being used in connection with a bona fide offer of goods or services and inference of bad faith registration and use is also given by the fact that there is no active content. Currently, the disputed domain name has active MX records, meaning that fraudulent emails could be sent from an address which would be likely to make a recipient believe that it is a legitimate communication from Complainant in connection with financial matters. &nbsp;Finally, Complainant&rsquo;s distinctive trademark registrations long predate Respondent&rsquo;s disputed domain name registration. This constitutes bad faith due to the gap of several years between the registration of Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks and Respondent&rsquo;s registration of the disputed domain name.<br \/><br \/>RESPONDENT: NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dinant T.L. Oosterbaan"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-02-05 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>Complainant is the owner of the trademark PENTAIR registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office with registration number 50003584 and registration date 19 July 2016.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "finance-pentair.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}