The Complainant operates public transport systems. The Complainant’s RATP group of companies is the world's 3rd largest urban transport operator, operating in 15 countries on five continents. It operates nine modes of transport on a daily basis, and employs 71,000 people. Its trademark “RATP” is well-established and highly distinctive.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name <bonusratp.com> resolves to an online gaming platform. The disputed domain names <bonusratp.biz>, <bonusratp.info> and <bonusratp.net> resolve to an error page. MX servers are configured for all four disputed domain names.<\/p>\n
The Complainant contends that the Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark “RATP”, or to apply for registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n
NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Dr. Thomas Schafft" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-02-22 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant owns various trademark registrations for the designation “RATP”, including the European trademark n°008945966 “RATP” (word), registered on January 31, 2011 (and duly renewed) for numerous goods and services in classes 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 27, 28, 30, 32, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 45.<\/p>\n
All disputed domain names were registered on December 16, 2023, i.e., the Complainant’s trademark registration cited above predates the registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "bonusratp.biz": "TRANSFERRED", "bonusratp.info": "TRANSFERRED", "bonusratp.net": "TRANSFERRED", "bonusratp.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }