The Complainant, Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., is an Italian banking group founded in 2007 and with branches in a large number of countries worldwide. The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the following registrations for the marks \"SUPERFLASH”.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name was registered on December 28, 2023 and resolves to a registrar parking page.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
COMPLAINANT<\/strong><\/p>\n The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks SUPERFLASH and its domain names. The Complainant contends that the marks are entirely reproduced in the domain name, with the addition of the generic term “loan”, referring to financial services offered by the Complainant.<\/p>\n Per the Complaint, the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not authorized by the Complainant in any way and that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Complainant equally asserts that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and that no fair or non-commercial use of the domain name can be found.<\/p>\n As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the disputed domain name includes the distinctive trademark SUPERFLASH. It is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the Complainant argues that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to his web site, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of his website. Therefore, the Complainant deems that the Respondent has registered and is using the domain name at issue in order to intentionally divert traffic away from the Complainant’s web site.<\/p>\n RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/p>\n NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Arthur Fouré"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2024-04-04 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " Identification Of Rights<\/p>\n The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the following trademarks:<\/p>\n - European trademark “SUPERFLASH” n. 9617887 registered on August 30, 2011, duly renewed and designating goods and services in classes 9, 35, 38, 41 and 42;<\/p>\n - European trademark “SUPERFLASH & design” n. 10263218 registered on November 26, 2012, duly renewed and designating goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42;<\/p>\n - European trademark “SUPERFLASH & design” registered on May 3, 2011, duly renewed and designating services in classes 35, 38, 41 and 42. <\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"SUPERFLASHLOAN.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}