{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106395",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-03-28 09:51:01",
    "domain_names": [
        "migros-fr-ch.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "MIGROS-GENOSSENSCHAFTS-BUND "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "SILKA AB",
    "respondent": [
        "Anonymized representative "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": "Anonymized Reprezentative respondent ",
    "factual_background": "",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed. However, on April 12, 2024, the CAC Arbitration Center received a letter by a French law firm dated April 11, 2024, stating that the legal entity named as the registrant of the disputed domain name in the respective WhoIs contact information had nothing to do with such domain name registration, but was the victim of an identity theft since numerous months.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>\n<p>The Panel orders the Respondent&acute;s identification is removed from the published version of the decision since there is a claim of identity theft.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Stephanie Hartung"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-05-06 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant has evidenced to be the owner of numerous trademarks relating to its company name and brand MIGROS, including, but not limited to the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Word\/device trademark MIGROS, International Registration (World Intellectual Property Organization), registration&nbsp;No.:&nbsp;315524, registration date: June 23, 1966, status: active;<\/li>\n<li>Word trademark MIGROS, International Registration (World Intellectual Property Organization), registration&nbsp;No.:&nbsp;397821, registration date: March 14, 1973, status: active.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Also, the Complainant has substantiated to own since at least 1996 the domain name &lt;migros.ch&gt;, which resolves to the Complainant&rsquo;s main website at &ldquo;www.migros.ch&rdquo;, used to promote the Complainant&rsquo;s products and related services in the retail industry.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": [],
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}