FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n
The Complainant claims to be Europe’s number one asset manager, with offices in Europe, Asia-Pacific, the Middle East, and the Americas. The Complainant states to have more than 100 million retail, institutional, and corporate clients all over the word.<\/p>\n
The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the AMUNDI Trademark as referred to above. <\/p>\n
The Complainant also states that it is the owner of various domain names that include the term “AMUNDI”. The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the registered owner of the domain name <amundi.com>, registered on August 26, 2004.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain <cryptamundi.com> was registered on March 8, 2024. According to the Complainant, the disputed domain name resolves to a parking page with commercial links.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n
The Respondent accessed the online case file and filed below cited submission. Although repeatedly instructed by the CAC, the Respondent did not file a Response form provided in the case.<\/p>\n
Respondent´s contention filed on March 15, 2024:<\/p>\n
“I made a purchase of this domain using artificial intellegence website askai.com I was looking for a unique name and the definition of cryptamundi in Latin means secret world or secret globe. At the same time the cryptocurrency relates to this so I have a business idea to create a blog, information website with real time data of those crypto markets so this is an information website which has absolutely nothing to do with your complain whatsoever. I think you just trying your way to bully and take away the domain from and let me also clarify, I have made this purchase I spent a lot of time thinking what's available to have and how I am going to go about this. I asked the AI to use Latin and english and I have purchased a few more domains to give me an edge over what I like to do. I have not done anything except buying the domain and because the crytp market is growing rapidly I believe you have seen this domain and want this yourself. That's my assumption of what I think but anyhow, I have not treaded on your toes on anything and you are making a complaint which clearly has no link to your business of what you have done before. No moves have been made except purchasing a domain and you are making assumptions. Go daddy had this property on sale, I used creativity and then then saw it available and I took it. I have the receipt for it and it's a purchase that I like to actually work on and not being irresponsible with the domain when I have only made this purchase withing a few weeks of your complaint. Clearly you have no proof over your claims you are using the system to take from me what you acquire.”<\/em><\/p>\n The Panel accepts this response as an administratively compliant response.<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Bart Van Besien"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2024-05-08 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the international trademark “AMUNDI”, no 1024160, registered on September 24, 2009, for various countries and for various subclasses in Nice class 36, including for banking and insurance related services (hereafter the “AMUNDI Trademark”).<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"cryptamundi.com": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}