{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106531", "time_of_filling": "2024-05-17 09:51:32", "domain_names": [ "INTESASP.NET" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A." ], "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.", "respondent": [ "luca mapozzi" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant claims to be the leading Italian banking group and a major player in the European banking and financial area. The Complainant is the result of a merger (as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two Italian banking groups. The Complainant is the leading banking group in Italy. The Complainant also claims to have a strong presence in Central-Eastern Europe, and to have an international network that supports corporate customers in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and areas where Italian companies are most active such as the United States, Russia, China and India.<\/p>\n

The Complainant claims to be the owner of several trademarks comprising the term “INTESA”. The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the various international and EU-trademarks that are listed above and referred to in this decision as the “Trademarks”.<\/p>\n

The Complainant also states that it is the owner of multiple domain names which include the word “INTESA”. However, the Complainant did not submit evidence that it is indeed the owner of such domain names. The Complainant provided screenshots of the website available via the domain name <intesasanpaolo.com>, which confirm that the Complainant operates the website available via this domain name.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <Intesasp.net> was registered on December 27, 2023.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Bart Van Besien" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-06-12 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the following trademarks:<\/p>\n