The Complainant is an Italian banking group, which results from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two Italian banking groups.<\/p>\n
The Complainant has a market capitalization exceeding 65,9 billion euro. The international network specialized in supporting corporate customers is present in 25 countries, in particular in the Mediterranean area and those areas where Italian companies are most active, such as the United States, Russia, China and India.<\/p>\n
On November 15, 2023, the Respondent registered the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name resolved to a website that, when using Google's Chrome Internet browser, is blocked by Google Safe Browsing because of a suspected phishing activity. Previously, the disputed domain name resolved to a website promoting financial services. The content of that website was removed after the Complainant asked the registrar to shut down the website.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Alfred Meijboom" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-07-19 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant owns several trademarks, including the following relevant trademark registrations:
- the International trademark n° 793367 for the word mark “INTESA”, registered on September 4, 2002 for services in class 36;
- the International trademark n° 920896 for the word mark “INTESA SANPAOLO”, registered on March 7, 2007 for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 41 and 42;
- the European Union trademark n° 012247979 for the word mark “INTESA”, registered on March 5, 2014, for goods and service in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42; and
- the European Union trademark n° 005301999 for the word mark “INTESA SANPAOLO”, registered on June 18, 2007, for services in classes 35, 36 and 38.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"INTESASANB.COM": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}