{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106588", "time_of_filling": "2024-06-17 09:31:31", "domain_names": [ "dichvubaohanhsamsung.com", "trungtamchinhhangsamsung.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd." ], "complainant_representative": "Coöperatie SNB-REACT U.A.", "respondent": [ "Cong Tien Nguyen (TNC Viet Nam)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, established in 1938, is one of the largest electronics companies in the world, present in more than 70 counties. It sells a variety of goods ranging from consumer electronics such as refrigerators, TVs and videos, to electronic gadgets such as cellular phones, computers and printers.

The disputed domain names <dichvubaohanhsamsung.com> and <trungtamchinhhangsamsung.com> were registered respectively on January 11, 2019 and October 10, 2021. Both direct to the same website reproducing the SAMSUNG mark of the Complainant.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks SAMSUNG. The Complainant contends that the marks are entirely reproduced in the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n

Per the Complaint, the Respondent is not authorized by the Complainant in any way and that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. The Complainant equally asserts that the use of the domain names in connection to an active website offering real estate services is neither fair, legitimate or non-commercial. On the contrary, the Complainant submits that the disputed domain names are used to disrupt the Complainant’s business.<\/p>\n

As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the disputed domain names include the distinctive and well-known trademark SAMSUNG and the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to his web site, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant's mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of his website. Therefore, the Complainant deems that the Respondent has registered and is using the domain names at issue in order to intentionally divert traffic away from the Complainant’s web site.<\/p>\n

RESPONDENT <\/strong><\/p>\n

NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Arthur Fouré" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-08-06 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "