{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106690",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-07-12 11:30:19",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelor-mittals.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Charlotte Elizabeth  Wright"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>As the Respondent did not file any response to the complaint, the Panel took into account the following facts asserted by the Complainant (and supported by the documentary evidence submitted by the Complainant) and unchallenged by the Respondent:<\/p>\n<div>\n<p><span>(a) the Complainant is the largest steel and mining company in the world and is the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging. It holds sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and operates extensive distribution networks;<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(b) the Complainant is the owner of the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark;<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(c) the Complainant owns various domain names including the same distinctive wording ARCELORMITTAL;<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(d) the disputed domain name was registered on 10 July 2024; and<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(e) there is no website under the disputed domain but its MX records are configured.<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>The Complainant seeks transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>THE COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<div>\n<p><span>In addition to the above factual assertions, the Complainant also contends the following:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>(i) the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark;<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(ii) the disputed domain name is also a clear case of \"typosquatting&ldquo;, i.e. the disputed domain name contains an obvious misspelling of Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark;<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(iii) the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant nor authorized by it in any way to use Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent;<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>(iv) registering the disputed domain name with the misspelling (slight spelling variation) of the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark was intentional attempt to create confusing similarity with the Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks and thus the registration was done in bad faith; and<\/span><br \/><br \/><\/p>\n<p>(v) the MX records of the disputed domain name are configured. Therefore, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name may be used for fraudulent purposes such as phishing.<\/p>\n<p><span>THE RESPONDENT:<br \/><br \/>The Respondent did not provide any response to the complaint.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>\n<p><span>For details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".<\/span><\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>\n<p><span>For details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".<\/span><\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>\n<p><span>For details, please see \"Principal Reasons for the Decision\".<\/span><\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under the Policy were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Michal Matějka"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-08-09 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant is the registered owner of international word trademark &ldquo;ArcelorMittal&rdquo;, reg. no. 947686, filed on 25 May 2007, registered on 3 August 2007, registered for goods and services in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42 (&ldquo;<strong>Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark<\/strong>&rdquo;).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name &lt;<\/span>arcelor-mittals.com&gt;<span> was registered on 10 July 2024.<\/span><\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "arcelor-mittals.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}