The Complainant is a global FinTech company and is developing international card-to-card transfers, allowing connections between 12 billion cards globally - Mastercard, Visa, China UnionPay and local card schemes. The Complainant is headquartered in the UK and its group companies are located in various countries, including the US and Serbia.<\/p>\n
Since the Complainant’s business started in 2017 it has launched a number of products, including “Paysend Global Transfers”, “Paysend Global Account”, “Paysend Connect”, “Paysend Business” and “Paysend Libre”.<\/p>\n
The Complainant currently serves over seven million customers and operates in over 170 countries globally. It is one of the leaders in the area of online money transfers and received various awards including “PayTech 2018” – “Best Consumer Payments” and “FinovateSpring 2018”- Leading FinTech Product.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name was registered on June 28, 2024 and initially did not resolve to an active website whereas at the time of the decision of this Panel the website resolves to a website under „ww1.wwwpaysend.com“, a parking page with commercial links to third companies.<\/p>\n
The Respondent was also Respondent in numerous other UDRP proceedings, inter alia, CAC-UDRP-106596 - <medinfoboehringer-ingelheim.com>, CAC-UDRP-105994 - <rolexparismaster.com> and CAC-UDRP-105882 - <EONBILLING.COM> to name only a few. In these cases, the disputed domain names were transferred to the Complainant.<\/p>\n
<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark PAYSEND since the mark is fully incorporated. The Complainant denies that the Respondent was authorised to use its trademarks in the disputed domain name. The Respondent was furthermore also respondent in numerous other ADR proceedings where the panels decided to transfer the domain name to the Complainant. Given the trademark of the Complainant in many territories for a long time before he disputed domain name was registered Complainant finally contends that the Respondent has registered and used the domain names with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark. <\/p>\n
NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Dietrich Beier" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-08-13 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant is, inter alia, proprietor of the International Registration 1251936 PAYSEND of April 10, 2015 in class 35 extended to numerous countries, inter alia the US, the mark being in effect.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "wwwpaysend.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }