{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106795",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-08-15 12:33:01",
    "domain_names": [
        "einiride.tech",
        "einride-tech.com",
        "einirde.tech"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Einride AB"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "SILKA AB",
    "respondent": [
        "Joanna  Drochuck ",
        "paul obi"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p><strong>FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Key aspects of the Complainant&rsquo;s contentions are summarized below.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Complainant&rsquo;s Background<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant, established in 2016 and based in Stockholm, Sweden, specializes in electric and self-driving vehicles. As a global leader in digital, electric, and autonomous freight mobility technology, the Complainant operates in Sweden, Norway, Germany, the Benelux region, the UK, and the US. Since 2018, it has consistently promoted its services and industry insights through its website &lt;einride.tech&gt;.<\/p>\n<p>With substantial recognition in the autonomous vehicle industry, the Complainant has appeared in at least several third-party rankings of top self-driving truck companies. The Complainant also maintains a strong social media presence, boasting over 300,000 followers on Facebook, more than 50,000 on LinkedIn, and thousands more across Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Registration of the disputed domain names<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to the registrar verification included with the Complaint, the disputed domain names were registered on the following dates:<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"302\">\n<p>&lt;einirde.tech&gt;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"302\">\n<p>May 20, 2024<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"302\">\n<p>&lt;einiride.tech&gt;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"302\">\n<p>June 1, 2024<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"302\">\n<p>&lt;einride-tech.com&gt;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"302\">\n<p>June 1, 2024<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Phishing Emails<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>On June 3 , 2024, an email originating from <a href=\"mailto:kerry.turnbull@einiride.tech%20e\">[redacted]@einiride.tech <\/a>was sent, purporting to be from the Complainant&rsquo;s Head of Corporate Finance &nbsp;and including the following text excerpt:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>&ldquo;(&hellip;) Thanks for your response. We now have a new bank account for USD funding IFX payment. Due to a fx crisis in Sweden, we will provide you with our Global USD bank details for the $5m deposit. Please send the signed Subscription Agreement, then I will share the bank details for funding. <\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>Looking forward to your reply. <\/em><em>&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em>Many thanks, <br \/>[redacted]&rsquo;&rsquo;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>On July 2, 2024, an email originating from [redacted]@einride-tech.com was sent, falsely claiming to be from the Complainant&rsquo;s Corporate Finance department. The email was replied to by an internet user on the same day, leading to several conversations exchanged in July 02 and 03. These emails aimed to divert payments to accounts presumably controlled by the Respondent.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Cease and Desist Letter<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When the Complainant became aware of the Respondent&rsquo;s registration and use of the disputed domain names, they instructed their representative to send the Respondent a cease-and-desist letter to notify them of the infringement of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark rights, requesting the immediate cease of any use and the transfer of the disputed domain names. Accordingly, a cease and desist letter was sent on June 3, 2024, to the registrant of &lt;einirde.tech&gt; via a contact form, however, &nbsp;the Respondent failed to respond to this correspondence.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Consolidation Request<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain names should be consolidated into a single complaint because they are subject to common control for the following reasons:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Two of the disputed domain names (&lt;einirde.tech&gt; and &lt;einiride.tech&gt;) are typosquatting variations of the Complainant&rsquo;s EINRIDE mark and official website.<\/li>\n<li>All three disputed domain names were registered within a short time frame, with only 12 days between the registration of &lt;einirde.tech&gt; and &lt;einiride.tech&gt;.<\/li>\n<li>All three disputed domain names were registered with the same registrar, PDR Ltd. d\/b\/a PublicDomainRegistry.com.<\/li>\n<li>All three disputed domain names had MX records, and at least two were used for phishing emails. &lt;einiride.tech&gt; and &lt;einride.tech.com&gt; have been suspended by the Registrar and as such no longer have active MX records.<\/li>\n<li>The registrant identities appear to have false addresses, such as \"30 varren\" in Warsaw, New York, and \"N0 13b Berlin close\" in Berlin, Germany, which do not correspond to valid postal addresses.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>First UDRP Element - disputed domain name is Confusingly Similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to its EINRIDE trademark. The Complainant notes that, &lt;einirde.tech&gt; and &lt;einiride.tech&gt; represent misspelled, typosquatting variants of the EINRIDE mark, while &lt;einride-tech.com&gt; incorporates the Complainant&rsquo;s EINRIDE mark in its entirety, merely followed by &lsquo;-tech&rsquo;. From a side-by-side comparison, Complainant asserts that its EINRIDE mark remains distinctly recognizable in all of the domain names.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the Complainant contends that the addition of the gTLD &ldquo;.tech&rdquo; and &lsquo;&rsquo;.com&rsquo;&rsquo; is merely instrumental to use in the Internet and does not affect the confusing similarity of the disputed domain names to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Second UDRP Element &ndash; The Respondent has no Rights or Legitimate Interests in the disputed domain names<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not a licensee, authorized agent, or related in any way to the Complainant, nor is authorized in any way to use the Complainant&rsquo;s trademarks or to register or use the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also claims that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain names as an individual, business, or other organization and their family names do not correspond to EINRIDE or the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends there is no evidence of demonstrable preparations to use nor actual use of the disputed domain names in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. Rather, the Respondent has unlawfully used two of the &nbsp;disputed domain names (&lt;einiride.tech&gt; and &lt;einride-tech.com&gt;) to impersonate employees of the Complainant. These emails included the actual employee names, titles, and the Complainant's official website, misleading recipients. According to the Complainant, the Respondent used these emails to attempt to divert payments to accounts presumably under its control. One such attempt involved a company called &lsquo;Einride Investment Ltd&rsquo;, falsely presented as being associated with the Complainant. This company was created just one day before the phishing emails and changed its name to something entirely different around two weeks later.<\/p>\n<p>Further, the Complainant also contends &nbsp;that while there is no direct evidence that the third domain name (&lt;einirde.tech&gt;) has been used for phishing;, its similar typosquatting composition, presence of MX records, and false WHOIS data suggest a high likelihood of fraudulent use. Additionally, the fact that the third domain name does not resolve to an active website further demonstrates a lack of bona fide use or legitimate interest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Third UDRP Element &ndash; The disputed domain names were Registered and are Being Used in Bad Faith<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that its EINRIDE trademarks enjoy recognition across multiple countries, well before the registration of the disputed domain names. Further, top Google search results for terms like &lsquo;einirde,&rsquo; &lsquo;einiride,&rsquo; and &lsquo;einride-tech&rsquo; lead to the Complainant&rsquo;s offerings. Therefore, the Complainant contends that any registrant conducting even the most basic search would have been aware of the well-established EINRIDE brand at the time of registration, making it unlikely that the Respondent could have been unaware of the Complainant&rsquo;s prior trademark rights.<\/p>\n<p>According to the Complainant, the Respondent has also demonstrated bad faith in the use of &lt;einiride.tech&gt; and &lt;einride-tech.com&gt; by impersonating the Complainant&rsquo;s employees in an attempt to phish payments from internet users, as previously described. The Respondent has used names and similar email addresses to those of the Complainant&rsquo;s employees, directly referencing the official website &lt;einride.tech&gt;, and has included deceptive email addresses, which at first glance appear to be controlled by the Complainant. This was done to solicit payments to accounts presumably controlled by the Respondent and the fictitious entity &lsquo;Einride Investment Ltd,&rsquo; which has no affiliation with the Complainant.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant further submits that despite sending a cease-and-desist letter to the Respondent in June 2024 regarding &lt;einirde.tech&gt;, the Respondent not only failed to respond but also proceeded to register another infringing domain name, &lt;einride-tech.com&gt;, which further demonstrates bad faith. The Respondent's phishing scheme and fraudulent conduct with the use of these domain names clearly show malicious intent. The Complainant notes that although there is no direct evidence of the use of &lt;einirde.tech&gt; for phishing, its similarities with the other domain names, MX records, and false WHOIS data indicate a high likelihood of bad faith use.<\/p>\n<p>In light of the evidence, the Complainant concludes that the disputed domain names were registered and used in bad faith, especially given the Respondent&rsquo;s failure to respond to the cease-and-desist letter and use of false WHOIS information.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><br \/>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it. Specifics of the Complainant&rsquo;s contentions are summarized above.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Claire Kowarsky"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-09-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant seeks to rely on the following registered trademarks:<\/p>\n<table width=\"548\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>Mark<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Owner<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Territory<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>Registration No.<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Registration Date<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>Classes<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Sweden<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>535582<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Nov. 04, 2016<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>7, 12, 20, 35, 39<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>European Union<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>017417908<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Feb, 25, 2018<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>7, 9, 12, 20, 35, 39, 42<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>United Kingdom<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>UK00917417908<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Feb 25, 2018<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>7, 9, 12, 20, 35, 39, 42<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>United States of America<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>5,865,326<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Sept. 24, 2019<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>9, 12, 39, 42<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE [with design elements]<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>&nbsp;IR (AE - AU - CA - CH - CN - MY - NO - SG - TH &ndash; US)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>1596452<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Mar. 04, 2021<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>&nbsp;9, 12, 35, 39, 42<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE [with design elements]<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>United States of America<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>6,841,374<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Sept. 13, 2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>9, 12, 35, 39, 42<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"66\">\n<p>EINRIDE<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>Einride AB<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"113\">\n<p>IR (AE - AU - CA - CH - CN - GB - MY - NO - SG - TH - US )<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"94\">\n<p>1722096<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"76\">\n<p>Dec. 2, 2022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p>6, 9, 12, 19, 20, 25, 28, 35, 37, 38, 39, 42<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Further, the Complainant operates its EINRIDE related business using the domain name &lt;einride.tech&gt; registered since 2018.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "einiride.tech": "TRANSFERRED",
        "einride-tech.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "einirde.tech": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}