{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-106862",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-09-13 09:26:02",
    "domain_names": [
        "boxofficerise.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOX OFFICE MEDIA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "niu lww (RELTIO, INC .)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant is a north American company for media publishing services, and technologies available to the global film industry, including for cinemas. The Complainant belongs to WEBEDIA a French media-tech and digital entertainment company, founded in 2007.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">WEBEDIA has presence in more than 15 countries, counts with more than 250 million viewers worldwide by month, and has more than 2,300 employees.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In addition to the BOXOFFICE trademarks, the Complainant also owns the domain name &lt;boxoffice.com&gt;, registered since February 19, 1997.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The disputed domain name &lt;boxofficerise.com&gt; was registered on September 5, 2024, and resolved to a website which sought to impersonate the Complainant. By the time of this Decision, the disputed domain name resolved to an inactive website with no content at all.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><u>Complainant Contentions<\/u>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding the first element of the Policy, in summary, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name &lt;boxofficerise.com&gt; is confusingly similar to the Trademark BOXOFFICE, which it is recognized in the disputed domain name.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding the second element of the Policy, in summary, the Complainant contends that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name; that the Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized in any way; that Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent, that neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, or apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant; that Respondent&rsquo;s use of the disputed domain name to impersonate the Complainant (including the use of the trademark BOXOFFICE and its logo), cannot be considered neither a <em>bona fide<\/em> offering of goods or services nor a legitimate non-commercial or fair use of the disputed domain name.<br \/><br \/><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Regarding the third element of the Policy, in summary, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith, given the actual knowledge that Respondent has over the Complainant, where the trademark BOXOFFICE and logo was reproduced on the website potentially for fraudulent purposes, seeking to impersonate the Complainant, falling into paragraph 4.b.(iv) of the Policy.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Response<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not reply to any of the Complainant's contentions.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to BOXOFFICE trademark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "María Alejandra López García"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-10-11 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant is a north American company for media publishing services, and technologies available to the global film industry, including for cinemas. The Complainant belongs to WEBEDIA a French media-tech and digital entertainment company, founded in 2007. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant owns the following trademarks:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">USPTO trademark for BOXOFFICE (word mark), Reg. No. 77713352, in International Class (&ldquo;IC&rdquo;) 35 and 41, registered on May 4, 2010, and in force until November 4, 2030.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">USPTO trademark for BOXOFFICE (word mark), Reg. No. 74536175, in IC 16, registered on May 30, 1995, and in force until December 1, 2025.<\/li>\n<\/ul>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "boxofficerise.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}