{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107031", "time_of_filling": "2024-11-04 12:22:44", "domain_names": [ "eruthyll.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Shanghai Jiyou Information Technology Co., Ltd. " ], "complainant_representative": "Mr Paddy Tam (CSC Digital Brand Services Group AB)", "respondent": [ "xianggang N\/A (xianggang)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, Shanghai Jiyou Information Technology Co Ltd (Shanghai Jiyou), is part of the Bilibili Group, a major video-sharing and streaming company. The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the registrations for the marks \"HIGAN: ERUTHYLL”.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name was registered on 26 June 2024 and resolves to a blank page.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademarks HIGAN: ERUTHYLL. The Complainant contends that the element ERUTHYLL of the marks is entirely reproduced in the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that Respondent is not authorized by the Complainant in any way and that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Complainant equally asserts that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and that no fair or non-commercial use of the domain name can be found. The use of a privacy protection service is, per the Complainant, an additional element showing the Respondent’s lack of legitimate interest in the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n

As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the Complainant submits that the Respondent necessarily had the Complainant’s trademarks in mind when registering the disputed domain name. The domain name includes part of the distinctive and well-known trademark HIGAN: ERUTHYLL. It is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the Complainant argues that the Respondent’s passive holding of the disputed domain name constitutes bad faith use. The Complainant equally argues that the Respondent engaged in “bait-and-switch” behavior, registering a domain name identical or similar to the Complainant’s trademarks for Internet users to visit, only to discovers that the domain name is entirely unrelated to the Complainant. Moreover, the Respondent provided false WHOIS information.<\/p>\n

RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Arthur Fouré" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-12-10 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the following trademarks:<\/p>\n