{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107024", "time_of_filling": "2024-11-06 09:35:11", "domain_names": [ "lamborghini-latinoamerica.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A." ], "complainant_representative": "Paolo Lazzarino (Nctm Studio Legale)", "respondent": [ "Vasilij" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A., is an Italian manufacturer of high-performance sports cars, founded in 1963.<\/p>\n

The Complainant is the owner of several LAMBORGHINI trademarks, including the international word mark LAMBORGHINI registered under No. 444261 registered on March 15, 1979 in classes 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 25.<\/p>\n

The Complainant owns, among others, the domain name <lamborghini.com>, which resolves to its official website.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name has been registered on October 10, 2022. The disputed domain name currently resolves to a website displaying the LAMBORGHINI trademark, sport cars, merchandising, and text about cars, casino, artificial intelligence and blockchain. <\/span><\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

Regarding other legal proceedings between the parties, the Complainant claims that the Respondent’s real identity is Automóviles Lamborghini Latinoamerica S.A. de C.V and\/or its legal representative Mr. Jorge Antonio Fernández García. The Complainant shows to have a vast contentious history with Automóviles Lamborghini Latinoamerica S.A.<\/p>\n

The Complainant states inter alia that “Automóviles has, from time to time, attempted to obtain trademark registrations for the sign “Lamborghini”; such trademark applications for registration have been promptly and successfully opposed by the Complainant.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Flip Petillion" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-12-16 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the holder of several trademarks including:<\/p>\n