{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107025", "time_of_filling": "2024-11-05 10:23:04", "domain_names": [ "tevapharmaceuticalsltd.site ", "tevapharmaceuticalsltd.shop", "tevapharmaceuticalsltds.site" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd " ], "complainant_representative": "SILKA AB", "respondent": [ "Brendon Lyon (premiermidtownrealtys)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant, established in 1901, is an internationally active and widely known pharmaceutical company. The Complainant maintains a portfolio of approximately 3,600 medicines, used by some 200 million people in 58 countries on six continents. The Complainant has over 50 manufacturing facilities and in the region of 37,000 employees.<\/p>\n

The three disputed domain names are not used for active websites, but they are all set up with active MX records, indicating that they are being used to send and receive email. The Complainant has provided evidence that at least the domain names <tevapharmaceuticalsltd.site> and <tevapharmaceuticalsltds.site> have been used for email communications to impersonate the Complainant in an employee recruitment phishing scheme.<\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant’s trademark “TEVA”, or to apply for registration of the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Dr. Thomas Schafft" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2024-12-16 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant owns various trademark registrations for the designation “TEVA”, including:<\/p>\n