{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107142",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-12-12 14:03:51",
    "domain_names": [
        "arcelormittalnorthamerica.info"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "HAROLD  DALE (AR DATA GROUP)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a major steel producing company, active worldwide, and the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is the owner of the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark and of various domain names, such as the domain name &lt;arcelormittal.com&gt; (since 27 January 2006).<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on 4 December 2024. The disputed domain name resolves to an error page.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark (i.e., the disputed domain name includes the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark in its entirety, combined with the geographical terms &ldquo;North America&rdquo; and the suffix &ldquo;.info&rdquo;).<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant claims that the Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not related to the Complainant in any way. No license or authorization has been granted to the Respondent to use the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark or register the disputed domain name. The email address and phone number used by the Respondent do not correspond to the Complainant or its subsidiaries. The disputed domain name resolves to an error page.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant claims that the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark is widely known. Given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's Trademark, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's Trademark. The disputed domain name refers to an error page.&nbsp; The Complainant contends that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, such as by being a passing off, an infringement of consumer protection legislation, or an infringement of the Complainant&rsquo;s rights under trademark law. The incorporation of a famous mark into a domain name, coupled with an inactive website, may be evidence of bad faith registration and use.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-01-03 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the international trademark &ldquo;ArcelorMittal&rdquo; (wordmark), no. 947686, registered on 3 August 2007 in classes 6, 7, 9, 12, 19, 21, 39, 40, 41 and 42, valid in various countries (hereinafter the &ldquo;Complainant&rsquo;s Trademark&rdquo;).<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also submitted evidence that it is has registered the domain name &lt;arcelormittal.com&gt; on 27 January 2006.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "arcelormittalnorthamerica.info": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}