{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107146", "time_of_filling": "2024-12-11 09:09:46", "domain_names": [ "nuxe-paris.com", "nuxeboutique.com", "nuxe-boutique.com" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "LABORATOIRE NUXE" ], "complainant_representative": "AUDE guillermard (ATOUTPI LAPLACE)", "respondent": [ "james black james black homes ltd (james black homes ltd)", "james black nuxe boutique", "john baley My Store Vincent's Yard (My Store)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant is a French company established in 1964 specialized in manufacture and trade of cosmetics as well as personal care products and related services promoted and sold under trademark “NUXE”. The Complainant is thus the owner of rights on the term “NUXE” as trademarks, company name\/trade names and domain names. The Complainant is selling its cosmetics all around the world and provide spa services in various countries. Trademark “NUXE PARIS” and its device is affixed on all communications means (websites whatever the language), on social networks as well as on all the cosmetic goods themselves.<\/p>\n

There are multiple disputed domain names: <nuxe-paris.com>, <nuxeboutique.com>, <nuxe-boutique.com> (hereinafter “disputed domain names”) and multiple Respondents. The first two disputed domain names, <nuxe-paris.com> and <nuxeboutique.com>, were registered on 6 and 7 November 2024, the third disputed domain name <nuxe-boutique.com> was registered on 23 October 2024. According to the Registrar, the Respondents are ‘James Black’ (<nuxe-paris.com>, <nuxeboutique.com>) and ‘John Baley’ (<nuxe-boutique.com>). The Respondent´s provided addresses are being at the UK.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

COMPLAINANT:

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n

No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Radim Charvát" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-01-14 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant states that it is the owner, among others, of the following trademark registrations:<\/span><\/p>\n