{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107044",
    "time_of_filling": "2024-12-19 10:05:09",
    "domain_names": [
        "pateklostandfound.com",
        "patekpapers.com",
        "patekcaseback.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "PATEK PHILIPPE SA GENEVE",
        "HENRI STERN WATCH AGENCY, INC"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Amandine LEBRET (Cabinet Vidon, Marques & Juridique PI)",
    "respondent": [
        "Robert Maron Inc",
        "Robert Maron Inc"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainants, Patek Philippe SA GENEVE, Switzerland (the Complainant No. 1) and Henri Stern Watch Agency, Inc., United States of America (the Complainant No. 2) (together &ldquo;the Complainants&rdquo;), contend that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to them.<\/p>\n<p>NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainants have, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainants have rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainants have, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainants have, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Stephanie Hartung"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-01-21 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainants have evidenced to be the owners of various trademark registrations<strong> <\/strong>relating to their PATEK PHILIPPE brand, including, but not limited to, the following:<\/p>\n<p>- word trademark PATEK, International registration (World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)), registration number: 280381, registration date: March 22, 1958, status: active;<\/p>\n<p>- word trademark PATEK PHILIPPE, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), registration No.:&nbsp;520291, registration date: January 24, 1950, status: active.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, the Complainants have demonstrated to enjoy rights in various domain names relating to the PATEK And PATEK PHILIPPE trademarks, e.g. since 1996 the domain name &lt;patek.com&gt; which resolves to the Complainants&rsquo; official website at &ldquo;www.patek.com&rdquo;, used to promote the Complainants&rsquo; watches and related other goods and services internationally.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "pateklostandfound.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "patekpapers.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "patekcaseback.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}