{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107213", "time_of_filling": "2025-01-02 09:46:48", "domain_names": [ "saint-qobian.ink" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "innocent gift (innokas limited)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant is a French company specialized in the production, processing and distribution of materials for the construction and industrial markets.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <saint-qobian.ink> was registered on December 13, 2024 <\/span>and resolves to a parking page with commercial links<\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n

<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant claims that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its prior trademark as the substitution of the letter “G” by the letter “Q” and the reversal of the letters “A” and “I” are not sufficient to escape the finding that the domain name is confusingly similar to the trademark SAINT-GOBAIN.<\/p>\n

The Complainant claims that the Respondent has no rights nor legitimate interest in registering the disputed domain name. According to the Complainant assertions, there is no evidence that the Respondent is known as the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n

The actual use (i.e. parking page) of the disputed domain name is not considered a \"bona fide offering of goods or services\" or a \"legitimate non-commercial or fair use\" for the purposes of the Policy.<\/p>\n

As regards registration and use in bad faith, the Complainant claims that since the SAINT-GOBAIN trademark is widely known, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's rights. Moreover, the disputed domain name <saint-qobian.ink> was used in a phishing scheme. <\/p>\n

RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n

The Respondent did not file an administrative response.<\/span><\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Andrea Mascetti" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-02-03 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of the following SAINT-GOBAIN trademarks:<\/p>\n