FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:
The Complainant is Deutsche Börse AG, a leading market place organizers for financial services, particularly services for trading in shares and other securities worldwide. Moreover, the Complainant is a transaction service provider, which affords international companies and investors access to global capital markets by means of advanced technology.
Previous panelists in other UDRP procedures have recognized the EUREX trademark as a renowned trademark.
The disputed domain name <eurex-ai.com> was registered on March 17, 2025.
Currently the disputed domain name is not active. However, from the submission provided by the Complainant it appears that the disputed domain name previously resolved to a website where trading services were offered. <\/p>",
"other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n
The Complainant contends that:<\/p>\n
1. The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark.
The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its distinctive trademark \"EUREX”.<\/p>\n
2. The Respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name
The Complainant contends that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name and that the Respondent is not affiliated with or authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name, and is not related to the Complainant’s business in any way. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business dealings with, the Respondent.
The Complainant further affirms that the disputed domain name is used to impersonate the Complainant or at least to create the false impression of an affiliation with the Complainant, and that such conduct can never confer rights or legitimate interests on a Respondent.<\/p>\n
3. The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith
The Complainant contends that owing to the distinctiveness of the Complainant’s trademark, it is inconceivable that the Respondent could have registered the disputed domain name without actual knowledge of Complainant's rights in the EUREX trademark.
In addition, the Complainant contends that the Respondent is deliberately trying to impersonate the Complainant in an attempt to attract Internet users for commercial gain to its own website where services in direct competition with those of the Complainant are offered. In support of this, the Complainant documents that, to impersonate or at least to create the false impression of an affiliation with the Complainant, the Respondent’s website, under the “We are located” section, gives the address “Mergenthalerallee 72 65760 Eschborn, Germany”, which is almost identical to the address of the headquarters of the Complainant, i.e. Mergenthalerallee 61, 65760 Eschborn, Germany.
The Complainant further affirms that the disputed domain name is used by the Respondent for fraudulent activities based on the exploitation of the reputation of the Complainant’s well-known EUREX trademarks. <\/p>\n
RESPONDENT:
NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED.<\/p>",
"rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Fabrizio Bedarida" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-05-08 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant is the owner of many « EUREX » registered trademarks, including the following:<\/p>\n
International trademark EUREX (device) registration No.635015, registered on December 5, 1994;
International trademark EUREX (word) registration No.812147, registered on July 28, 2003;
European trademark EUREX (word) registration No. 000744763, registered on June 8, 1999.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"eurex-ai.com": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}