{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107524",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-04-28 08:54:53",
    "domain_names": [
        "bourseramabanque.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Angel CHAUVAIN"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is a prominent French company engaged in the provision of financial products including banking services and related goods and services and it has been so engaged since 1995. As well as its aforesaid trademark, the Complainant owns the &lt;boursoramabanque.com&gt; domain name which it uses in its business to offer its financial services. It has come to the Complainant's notice that the Respondent has registered the domain name &lt;bourseramabanque.com&gt;, making only a small spelling alteration to the word \"BOURSORAMA\" to construct the Disputed Domain Name and has then caused the domain name to resolve to a parking page, but otherwise the Respondent has not used the Disputed Domain Name for any purpose. The Complainant maintains that this is inimical to itself and its business as, for among other reasons, it gives rise to the potential for the Disputed Domain Name to be used in the future for illegitimate purposes. Accordingly, the Complainant has instituted this proceeding to have the Disputed Domain Name transferred to itself.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the Disputed Domain Name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>A) COMPLAINANT<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is a well-known French company engaged in the provision of financial products including banking services and related goods and services and it has been so engaged since 1995.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is the owner of the aforesaid French trademark for BOURSORAMA BANQUE, registered number 3676762, registered on September 16, 2009 and it provides its goods and services under that trademark.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant has registered numerous domain names including the &lt;boursoramabanque.com&gt; domain name which it registered on May 26, 2005 and which it uses to promote and offer its goods and services on the internet.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent registered the &lt;bourseramabanque.com&gt; on April 24, 2025 (&ldquo;the Disputed Domain Name&rdquo;).<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent has caused the Disputed Domain Name to resolve to a parking page, but has otherwise not used it for any purpose.<\/p>\n<p>The Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the trademark as it embodies the entire BOURSORAMA BANQUE trademark, with the exception that the second letter \"o\" in the trademark has been deleted and replaced with the letter \"e\" and the addition of the generic Top Level Domain &rdquo;.com&rdquo;, which would inculcate in the minds of internet users the notion that the Disputed Domain Name is related to the trademark.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the Disputed Domain Name as:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (a) the Respondent is not commonly known by the Disputed Domain Name within the meaning of paragraph 4(c)(ii) of the Policy;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (b) the Respondent is not affiliated with or related in any way to the Complainant, has not been authorized by it to register or use the Disputed Domain Name and does not carry on any activity or have any business with the Complainant;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (c) the Disputed Domain Name is a typosquatted version of the BOURSORAMA BANQUE trademark;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (d) &nbsp;the Disputed Domain Name resolves to a parking page but has not been otherwise used and no demonstrable plan to use it has been revealed by the evidence; and&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; (e) there is no other ground on which it could be argued that the Respondent has a right or legitimate interest in the Disputed Domain Name.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent has registered and used the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith as:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (a) the Respondent has registered the Disputed Domain Name which is confusingly similar to the BOURSORAMA BANQUE trademark;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (b) the Respondent has engaged in typosquatting, showing that the Respondent intended that the Disputed Domain Name would be confusingly similar to the Complainant's BOURSORAMA BANQUE trademark;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (c) the Respondent had actual knowledge of the Complainant and its trademark at the time it registered the Disputed Domain Name;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (d) the Respondent has caused the Disputed Domain Name to resolve to a parking page, showing that the Respondent had no legitimate use in mind for the Disputed Domain Name and in any event, it is impossible to conceive of any such legitimate use of the domain name;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (e) the Respondent has caused the Disputed Domain Name to be set up with MX records, suggesting that the Respondent will use it for email purposes which will in all probability militate against the interests of the Complainant and internet users generally; and<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (f) all of the acts, facts, matters and circumstances to be revealed by the evidence will show that the Respondent has registered and used the Disputed Domain Name in bad faith.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the Complainant contends that it will be able to establish all of the elements it must prove under the Policy and that it is entitled to the relief it seeks, namely the transfer of the Disputed Domain Name to itself.<\/p>\n<p>B) RESPONDENT<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not file a Response in this proceeding.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Neil Brown (Presiding Panelist)"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-05-21 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant has established that it is the owner of the French trademark for the Word and device mark BOURSORAMA BANQUE registered number 3676762, registered on September 16, 2009 (&ldquo;the BOURSORAMA BANQUE trademark&rdquo;).<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "bourseramabanque.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    }
}