{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107567",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-05-13 09:07:39",
    "domain_names": [
        "klingaiapk.com",
        "klingaiapk.pro"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Mr Yi Sun (Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology Co. Ltd.)",
        "Mr Yi Sun (Beijing Kuaishou Technology Co. Ltd.)"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Saurav Kumar",
        "Harsh Kumar"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainants are high-tech companies focusing on artificial intelligence and audio-visual technology. They developed an AI product named KLING AI, which generates videos based on words, pictures or videos provided by the user and has become well-known.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain names &lt;klingaiapk.pro&gt; and &lt;klingaiapk.com&gt; were registered respectively on September 3 and 4, 2024.<\/p>\n<p>At the time of the filing of the Complaint, both disputed domain names resolved to a virtually identical website which prominently displayed the Complainants' EUIPO logo mark and offered competing software named &lsquo;Kling AI Mod APK&rsquo;.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainants contend that they have established all three elements entitling them to relief.<\/p>\n<p>In full, the Response is as follows:<\/p>\n<p>\"Hey,<\/p>\n<p>I have closed both domains after seeing your email.<\/p>\n<p>Also, Both website was for only educational purposes that's why Didn't place any ads or anything to earn from that website.<\/p>\n<p>When I was created both website, then There was no website offering to give downloading link of Kling AI and However, People wants to use this app on mobile.<\/p>\n<p>That's why I have added official APK so that users can continue their work on mobile.<\/p>\n<p>But, No problem, No [<em>scil <\/em>\"now\"] app is available in Google Play Store. Users can download easily.<\/p>\n<p>Hope you'll understand my situation.\"<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainants have, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainants have rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainants have, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondents to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainants have, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>\n<p>In particular, the Panel has granted the Complainants' request for consolidation of the proceedings regarding the disputed domain names because:<\/p>\n<p>(i) their second-level names are identical: &lsquo;klingaiapk&rsquo;;<\/p>\n<p>(ii) when the Complaint was filed, both domain names resolved to a largely identical webpage;<\/p>\n<p>(iii) they were registered within 2 days of each other; and<\/p>\n<p>(iv) the Respondents both come from India and share the same family name, Kumar.<\/p>\n<p>(v) in the provided Response the Respondent states to be the creator of both websites connected to the disputed domain names.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the Panel finds that the disputed domain names are subject to common control and that consolidation would be fair and equitable to all parties.<br \/><br \/><\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Alan Limbury"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-06-04 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant Beijing Dajia Internet Information Technology Co. Ltd. (the \"First Complainant\") is an 'indirect wholly-owned subsidiary' of the <span class=\"title\">Complainant <\/span>Beijing Kuaishou Technology Co. Ltd.<\/p>\n<p>The First Complainant owns trademark registrations for KLING in <em>inter alia<\/em> Hong Kong, n&deg; 306591466, registered on June 24, 2024 and the UK, n&deg; 00004072097, registered on July 5, 2024. Based on their relationship, the Panel finds both Complainants have rights in the KLING mark.<\/p>\n<p>The First Complainant also owns the EUIPO logo mark n&deg; 019045109, registered on October 30, 2024, in which both Complainants have rights.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "klingaiapk.com": "TRANSFERRED",
        "klingaiapk.pro": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}