{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107630",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-06-03 09:08:00",
    "domain_names": [
        "qliksense.shop",
        "qliktech.shop",
        "qlikview.shop"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "QlikTech International AB"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Abion AB",
    "respondent": [
        "Callum Frost"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>Complainant states that it &ldquo;was founded in Sweden in 1993, and forms part of the QlikTech Group,&rdquo; which is &ldquo;a global leader in artificial intelligence, data analytics and business intelligence solutions, offering software to businesses worldwide,&rdquo; &ldquo;serv[ing] more than 40,000 global customers and has more than 235,000 community members.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain names were created on March 27, 2025 (&lt;qliktech.shop&gt; and &lt;qlikview.shop&gt;) and March 28, 2025 (&lt;qliksense.shop&gt;). Complainant states, and provides documentation in support thereof, that each of the disputed domain names &ldquo;resolve[s] to GoDaddy.com parking pages listing the disputed domain names for sale with a buy-now price of USD 1,450.&rdquo;<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>Complainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:<\/p>\n<p>Paragraph 4(a)(i): Complainant states that each of the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to the QLIK Trademark because each contains one of the QLIK Trademarks in its entirety.<\/p>\n<p>Paragraph 4(a)(ii): Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names because, inter alia, &ldquo;Complainant has never granted the Respondent with any rights to use the [QLIK Trademark] in any form, including in the disputed domain names&rdquo;; &ldquo;Complainant has not found that the Respondent is known by the disputed domain names&rdquo;; &ldquo;[t]here is no evidence showing that the Respondent has been using, or preparing to use, the disputed domain names in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services or has made a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain names&rdquo;; &ldquo;the structure of the disputed domain names&hellip; reflect the Respondent&rsquo;s intention to create an association, and a subsequent likelihood of confusion, in Internet users&rsquo; mind&rdquo;; and Respondent has not replied to Complainant&rsquo;s cease-and-desist letter.<\/p>\n<p>Paragraph 4(a)(iii): Complainant states that the disputed domain names were registered and are being used in bad faith because, inter alia, the QLIK Trademarks &ldquo;are widely known trademarks registered in many countries and the Complainant enjoys a strong online presence&rdquo;; &ldquo;the structure of the disputed domain names&hellip; shows that the Respondent registered the disputed domain names having the Complainant and its trademarks in mind&rdquo;; Respondent lost a previous decision under the UDRP, Arcelormittal v. Callum Frost, CAC Case No. UDRP-107460; &ldquo;the disputed domain names were registered with the intent to sell, likely in excess of the Respondent&rsquo;s out-of-pocket costs directly related to the disputed domain names&rdquo;; Respondent has not replied to Complainant&rsquo;s cease-and-desist letter; and &ldquo;it is likely that the Respondent has provided false WhoIs details&rdquo; because &ldquo;the address provided does not correspond to an exact address, but to an entire city.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Douglas Isenberg"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-07-02 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>Complainant states, and provides documentation in support thereof, that it is the owner of multiple registrations for trademarks that consist of or contain QLIK (the &ldquo;QLIK Trademark&rdquo;), including the following: EU Reg. No. 001115948 for QLIK (registered May 16, 2000), Int&rsquo;l. Reg. No. 1236345 for QLIK SENSE (registered November 6, 2014), EU Reg. No. 004106654 for QLIKTECH (registered May 16, 2006) and EU Reg. No. 003831427 for QLIKVIEW (registered January 17, 2006).<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "qliksense.shop": "TRANSFERRED",
        "qliktech.shop": "TRANSFERRED",
        "qlikview.shop": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}