The Complainant is part of a family-owned pharmaceutical group of companies with roots going back to 1885. The Complainant’s group has become a global research-driven pharmaceutical enterprise with about 53,500 employees. It is divided into two business areas: Human Pharma and Animal Health. In 2024, net sales of the BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM group amounted to EUR 26,796 million.<\/p>\n
The Complainant developed a prescription medicine used along with diet and exercise to lower blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes, and also to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death in adults with type 2 diabetes who have known cardiovascular disease. This medicine is sold under the registered word mark JARDIANCE which covers numerous countries all over the world. The Complainant also owns domain names comprising the same term, such as <jardiance.com> registered on April 30, 2008.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain names <jardiance-commercial.cfd>, <jardiance-used-for.cfd> were registered on May 14, 2025, and the disputed domain name <what-is-jardiance-used-for.cfd> was registered on May 23, 2025. According to the Complainant’s evidence, the disputed domain names all resolved to parking pages including sponsored links. The Panel observes that the disputed domain names currently do not resolve to an active website.<\/span><\/p>",
"other_legal_proceedings": " The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>",
"no_response_filed": " The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain names should be transferred to it. The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Flip Petillion"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2025-07-08 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " The Complainant invokes the following registered trademark in this case:<\/p>\n - JARDIANCE, international trademark No. 981336 registered since September 3, 2008 in class 5, and covering various countries.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"jardiance-commercial.cfd": "TRANSFERRED",
"jardiance-used-for.cfd": "TRANSFERRED",
"what-is-jardiance-used-for.cfd": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": "