{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107624",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-05-29 09:36:38",
    "domain_names": [
        "qliksense.xyz"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "QlikTech International AB"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Abion AB",
    "respondent": [
        "Yu Qing Qing"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, founded in Sweden in 1993, forms part of the QlikTech Group, a company in athe field of artificial intelligence, data analytics and business intelligence solutions, offering software to businesses in many countries. Through its QILK and QLIK SENSE data analytics platform, which was launched in 2014, the QlikTech Group offers services to businesses to transform raw data into actionable insights by facilitating the analysis and gathering of information, and by enabling data integration from different sources. As of 2025, the QlikTech Group serves more than 40,000 customers and has more than 235,000 community members. The QlikTech Group also maintains a network of international partners, including Amazon, Google and Microsoft. The QlikTech Group has a presence in many countries including offices in North America, Canada, Latin America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Africa, and China.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The language of the Registration Agreement for the disputed domain name is Chinese.&nbsp; Pursuant to the <span>Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the &ldquo;Rules&ldquo;)<\/span>, paragraph 11(a), in the absence of an agreement between the parties, or unless specified otherwise in the registration agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement.<\/p>\n<p>The Complaint was filed in English. The Complainant requested that the language of the proceedings be English since the disputed domain name consist of Latin characters instead of the Chinese script, the disputed domain name consists of the Complainant&rsquo;s QLIK SENSE trademark which includes the English word, &ldquo;sense&rdquo; which shows that the Respondent is familiar with the English language. The Complainant is located in Sweden and the Respondent is Chinese. English, as an international and neutral language, should therefore be used as the language of the proceedings as it would be fair to both parties. The disputed domain name resolves to an English website which offers the disputed domain name for sale, which demonstrates that the Respondent understands the English language and aims to target English speaking Internet users. The Respondent has registered many other domain names which incorporate English words which demonstrates that the Respondent understands English well. The Respondent has been involved in numerous UDRP proceedings conducted in English despite their respective registrations&rsquo; agreements being in Chinese, and the language in almost all of those proceedings were determined to be in English. Further, and in order to proceed in Chinese, the Complainant would have to retain specialized translation services at a cost very likely to be higher than the overall cost of these proceedings. The use of Chinese in this case would therefore impose a burden on the Complainant which must be deemed significant in view of the low cost of these proceedings.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not make any submissions with respect to the language of the proceeding.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In exercising its discretion to use a language other than that of the registration agreement, the Panel has to exercise such discretion judicially in the spirit of fairness and justice to both parties, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the case, including matters such as the parties&rsquo; ability to understand and use the proposed language, time and costs (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (&ldquo;WIPO Overview 3.0&rdquo;), section 4.5.1).<\/p>\n<p>Having considered the circumstances of this case including the composition of the disputed domain name which contains the words in Latin characters, the fact that the disputed domain name resolves to a webpage in the English language providing offers for sale of the disputed domain name in English, the Respondent other domain name registration in the English language, the Respondent's involvement in numerous UDRP proceedings in the English language, as well as the fact that Respondent did not object to the Complainant's request nor participated in this proceeding, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English.&nbsp; There does not appear to be any reasons which warrant a delay and additional expense in ordering the Complainant to translate the Complaint.<\/p>\n<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Jonathan Agmon"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-07-10 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the owner of various trademark registrations, including the following:-<\/p>\n<p>International trademark registration No. 839118 for QLIK, registered on May 14, 2004;<\/p>\n<p>European Union trademark registration No. 001115948 for QLIK, registered on May 16, 2000;<\/p>\n<p>United States trademark registration No. 2657563 for QLIK, registered on December 10, 2002;<\/p>\n<p>International trademark registration No. 1236345 for QLIK SENSE, registered on November 6, 2014;<\/p>\n<p>European Union trademark registration No. 012889481for QLIK SENSE, registered on October 2, 2014; and<\/p>\n<p>United States trademark registration No. 5050190 for QLIK SENSE, registered on September 27, 2016.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant owns and operates the following domain names:-<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>&lt;qlik.com&gt;, registered on March 17, 1998;<\/li>\n<li>&lt;qlikview.com&gt;, registered on April 10, 2000;<\/li>\n<li>&lt;qliksense.com&gt;, registered on May 15, 2014; and<\/li>\n<li>&lt;qlikview.org&gt;, registered on May 15, 2014.&nbsp;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on February 14, 2025, and at the time of filing the Complaint, resolved to a GoDaddy website where it is being offered for sale for USD$1450.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent is Yu Qing Qing of qing jiang pu qu jian kang xi lu 51 hao xin shi ji hao yuan 1 hao lou 3023 shi, Jiangsu, huai an shi, 100000 China.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "qliksense.xyz": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}