{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107670", "time_of_filling": "2025-06-18 13:16:54", "domain_names": [ "bourso-bank.cc" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "BOURSORAMA" ], "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.", "respondent": [ "lapuenta covanasa" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

A<\/strong>. Complainant's Factual Assertions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant is a leader in online brokerage, financial information, and banking in France, boasting nearly 7.6 million customers.<\/p>\n

B<\/strong>. <\/span>Respondent<\/strong>'<\/span>s Factual Assertions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Respondent has failed to submit a Response in this UDRP proceeding, thereby leaving the Complainant's assertions unchallenged.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is unaware of any pending or concluded legal proceedings concerning the domain name <bourso-bank.cc> (referred to as 'the disputed domain name').<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

A<\/strong>. Complainant<\/strong>'s Submissions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant's arguments may be summarised as follows:<\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.1 The disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant asserts that the disputed domain name <bourso-bank.cc> is confusingly similar to its trade mark BOURSOBANK. The addition of a hyphen and the suffix <.cc> does not diminish the likelihood of confusion with the trade mark BOURSOBANK.<\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.2 The Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant highlights that the Respondent is not identified in the Whois database as the owner of the disputed domain name. As established in prior cases, the absence of association indicates a lack of rights or legitimate interests. The Respondent is not authorised to use the trade mark BOURSOBANK, and the disputed domain name has been used to create a misleading login page, potentially compromising the personal information of the Complainant's clients.<\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.3 The Respondent registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant contends that the trade mark BOURSO holds significant recognition both in France and abroad concerning online financial services. Given the registration of the disputed domain name, along with its operation as a login page impersonating the Complainant’s official website, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent acted with knowledge of the Complainant's trade marks. This conduct constitutes an intentional attempt to mislead Internet users and could result in the gathering of sensitive personal data. Consequently, the Complainant asserts that the registration and use of the disputed domain name have been executed in bad faith.<\/p>\n

A<\/strong>.<\/span>4 Relief sought<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Complainant requests the transfer of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n

B<\/strong>. <\/span>Respondent<\/strong>'<\/span>s Submissions<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Respondent has provided no substantive defence in this ADR proceeding.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trade mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel confirms that all procedural requirements under the UDRP have been duly met, with no grounds preventing a decision from being issued. <\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Yana Zhou" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-07-14 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant, Boursorama, operating under the name Boursobank, asserts rights to the following registered trade marks:<\/p>\n

• <\/span>French trade mark registration no. 3009973, filed on 22 February 2000, for the word mark BOURSO, in classes 9, 35, 36, 38, 41, and 42 of the Nice Classification; and<\/p>\n

• <\/span>International trade mark registration no. 1757984, filed on 28 August 2023, for the figurative mark BOURSOBANK, in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38, and 41 of the Nice Classification.<\/p>\n

Collectively, these trade marks shall be referred to as 'the Complainant's trade marks'.<\/p>\n

Additionally, the Complainant holds multiple domain names incorporating the terms 'bourso' and ‘boursobank’, most notably <bourso.com>, registered in 1998, and <boursobank.com>, registered in 2005.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <bourso-bank.cc> was registered on 17 June 2025. Presently, the disputed domain name resolves to a login page (referred to as 'the Respondent’s website').  <\/p>", "decision_domains": { "bourso-bank.cc": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }