According to the information provided the disputed domain name <lyondelibasell.com> was registered on 8 June 2025. <\/p>\n
According to the information provided by Complainant the disputed domain name currently does not resolve to an active website. In addition MX records have been set up.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
Complainant: <\/b>
Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
According to the evidence submitted by Complainant, Complainant is the third largest plastics, chemicals and refining company and the largest licensor of polyethylene and polypropylene technologies in the world. Complainant has over 20,300 employees around the globe and manufactures at 75 sites in 20 countries. Its products are sold into over 100 countries.
Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark. According to Complainant the only difference between the LYONDELLBASELL trademark and the disputed domain name is represented by the substitution of one letter, the third and final “l” of the LYONDELL part of the trademakr with an “i”. Such difference neither effects the attractive power of the trademark, nor is sufficient to prevent the finding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and Complainant’s mark, but even enhances the likelihood of confusion as it is clearly a typo.<\/p>\n
According to the evidence submitted by Complainant, Complainant is the third largest plastics, chemicals and refining company and the largest licensor of polyethylene and polypropylene technologies in the world. Complainant has over 20,300 employees around the globe and manufactures at 75 sites in 20 countries. Its products are sold in over 100 countries.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Complainant submits that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to Complainant's trademark. According to Complainant the only difference between the LYONDELLBASELL trademark and the disputed domain name is represented by the substitution of one letter, the third and final “l” of the LYONDELL part of the trademark with an “i”. Such difference neither affects the attractive power of the trademark, nor is sufficient to prevent the finding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain name and Complainant’s mark, but even enhances the likelihood of confusion as it is clearly a typo.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
According to Complainant, Respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name. Complainant submits that it has no relationship with Respondent whatsoever. Respondent has never received any approval from Complainant, express or implied, to use its trademark or any other mark identical or confusingly similar to such marks, nor to register any domain name identical or confusingly similar to such mark. There is no evidence that Respondent has acquired any rights in a trademark or trade name corresponding to the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n
Complainant further asserts that the disputed domain name previously redirected to a parking page with sponsored links and that it is set up to send emails, therefore indicating that they have been registered to be involved in phishing activities\/storage spoofing. Such use of the disputed domain name is clearly not a bona fide, legitimate or fair use under the UDRP Policy.<\/p>\n
Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Dinant T.L. Oosterbaan"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2025-08-11 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " According to the evidence submitted by Complainant, Complainant is the owner of multiple trademarks for LYONDELLBASELL, including the trademark LYONDELLBASELL (wordmark), no. 77467965 registered with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, registration date 9 June 2009.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
" lyondelibasell.com": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}
Respondent:<\/strong>
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": "