{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107836",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-08-08 09:30:25",
    "domain_names": [
        "boursobank-notify.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "francine dandin (leconte dandin francine)"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant, operating under the name BOURSOBANK, is a French company that provides services in the field of online brokerage, financial information on the Internet and online banking. In France alone, the Complainant has nearly 8 million customers. The Complainant operates a portal on the website www.boursorama.com, which also contains an online banking platform.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on August 5, 2025 and it does not resolve to any active website. <span>Additionally, email exchange (&ldquo;MX&rdquo;) records are configured on the disputed domain name.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it. In particular, the Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its BOURSOBANK trademark as this trademark is contained in its entirety within the disputed domain name. Further, the Complainant contends that the addition of the word &ldquo;notify&rdquo; is not sufficient to avoid the likelihood of confusion and that the .com\" TLD is viewed as a standard registration requirement and as such should be disregarded.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;Regarding the second UDRP element, the Complainant asserts that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and it is not related in any way with the Complainant. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark, or to apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant. The Respondent is also not known by the disputed domain name. Finally, The Complainant contends that the Respondent did not use the disputed domain name or has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>With respect to the third UDRP element, the Complainant holds that its BOURSOBANK trademark has a significant reputation in France and abroad in connection with online financial services and that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark. Although the disputed domain name resolves to an inactive page, such inactivity should not prevent a finding of bad faith in accordance with the passive holding doctrine. Finally, the disputed domain name has been set up with MX records, which suggests that it may be actively used for email purposes.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Stefan Bojovic"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-09-18 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant has demonstrated ownership of rights in the trademark&nbsp;<\/span>BOURSOBANK <span>for the purposes of standing to file a UDRP complaint.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>In particular, the Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations for&nbsp;<\/span>BOURSOBANK<span>, including the following:&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>- International trademark registration No.&nbsp;1757984 for BOURSOBANK (word\/device), registered on August 28, 2023.<span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also refers to ownership over the number of domain names that incorporate its BOURSOBANK trademark, such as &lt;boursobank.com&gt;, registered on November 23, 2005.&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "boursobank-notify.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}