{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107914",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-09-03 09:15:36",
    "domain_names": [
        "info-bourso.credit"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "lumino  farigo"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p><span>FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Complainant is a financial institution <\/span>operating under the name &ldquo;BoursoBank&rdquo;, and using the <span>BOURSO trademark. Under such mark, it engages in three core businesses of online brokerage, delivery of financial information on the Internet and online banking. The Complainant asserts that it is a pioneer of online banking, with a portal at &ldquo;www.boursorama.com&rdquo;, and claims nearly 7.6 million customers. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Complainant is the owner of French Registered Trademark Number 3009973 for the word mark BOURSO, registered on February 22, 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Complainant owns a number of domain names incorporating the BOURSO mark, including &lt;boursorama.com&gt;, registered since March 1, 1998, and &lt;bourso.com&gt;, registered since January 11, 2000.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on August 28, 2025, and resolves to an inactive site. MX records are configured on the associated nameservers.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><span>Complainant:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark BOURSO. The addition of the word &ldquo;info&rdquo; is insufficient to avoid the likelihood of confusion and does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the said trademark, and the Complainant&rsquo;s associated domain names. The suffix &ldquo;.credit&rdquo; likewise does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the said trademark or prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant, its trademark and the Complainant&rsquo;s associated domain names. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name has been registered by the Respondent without rights or legitimate interests. The Respondent is not <\/span>identified in the WhoIs database as the disputed domain name<span>. Previous panels under the Policy have held that a respondent was not commonly known by a domain name if the WhoIs entry was not similar to such domain name.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The Respondent is not known by the Complainant. The Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way. The Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent. Neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant&rsquo;s BOURSO trademark, or to apply for registration of the disputed domain name. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name is currently inactive. The Respondent did not make any use of disputed domain name since its registration and has no demonstrable plan to use the disputed domain name. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. The Complainant&rsquo;s BOURSO trademark has a significant reputation in connection with online financial services, and previous cases under the Policy have confirmed said mark&rsquo;s reputation. G<\/span>iven the distinctiveness and reputation of the Complainant's trademark <span>BOURSO<\/span>, it is reasonable to infer that <span>the Respondent has registered and used the disputed domain name with full knowledge of such trademark.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The disputed domain name resolves to an inactive page. The Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, such as by being a passing off, an infringement of consumer protection legislation, or an infringement of the Complainant&rsquo;s rights under trademark law. Previous panels under the Policy have held that the incorporation of a famous mark into a domain name, coupled with an inactive website, may be evidence of bad faith registration and use.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>MX servers are configured for the disputed domain name, which suggests that it may be used actively for e-mail purposes. It is inconceivable that the Respondent would be able to make any good faith use of the disputed domain name as part of an e-mail address.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Respondent:<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Andrew Lothian (Presiding Panelist)"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-09-26 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p><span>The Complainant is the owner of the following French registered trademark:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>BOURSO, word mark, registered February 22, 2000, under number 3009973, for goods and services in Nice Classes 9, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "info-bourso.credit": "TRANSFERRED"
    }
}