{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107906",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-09-01 09:58:27",
    "domain_names": [
        "gestion-bourso.contact"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "BOURSORAMA"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "lucas dumas"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant provides brokerage, financial information and banking services over the Internet through a portal at www.boursorama.com. It has over 4 million customers.<\/p>\n<p>Besides the registered national trademarks BOURSO (French) and BOURSOBANK (international registration) the Complainant also owns several domain names which include the word element &ldquo;BOURSO&rdquo;, such as the domain name &lt;boursorama.com&gt;, registered since 1 March, 1998 or &lt;bourso.com&gt;, registered since 11 January, 2000 and &lt;boursobank.com&gt; registered since 23 November, 2005.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name, &lt;<span>gestion-bourso.contact<\/span>&gt; was registered by the respondent on 27 August, 2025 <strong>and<\/strong> resolves to an inactive website.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><strong>THE COMPLAINANT'S CONTENTIONS:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Identical or confusingly similar<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name &lt;gestion-bourso.contact&gt; and the Complainant's registered trademark BOURSO are confusingly similar.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Particularly, the Complainant contends that its trademark is fully contained within the disputed domain name and points out that the addition of the French term &ldquo;gestion&rdquo; is less relevant and does alter the overall same impression the domain name and the registered trademark leave.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant also points out that the applicable Top-Level suffix &ldquo;.contact&rdquo; does not per se prevent likehood of confusion.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>No rights or legitimate interests<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant argues that there is no evidence at all that the Respondent is commonly known by the disputed domain name or a name corresponding to the disputed domain name, nor that the Respondent is doing any business with the Complainant. Moreover, the Complainant states that the Respondent has not been licensed or authorized in other way to use the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark nor to apply for or use any domain name incorporating such trademark.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Registered and used in bad faith<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As far as bad faith registration is concerned, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and concludes that it is not possible to conceive of any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate, taking into consideration the reputation of the BOURSO trademarks.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name has been set up with MX records which, according to him, suggests that it may be actively used for email purposes.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>RESPONDENT'S CONTENTIONS:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent has not responded to the Complaint.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Hana Císlerová (Presiding Panelist)"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-09-30 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant relies on a French trademark BOURSO, No. 3009973 with priority date from 22 February 2000 registered for goods and services in classes 9, 35, 36, 38, 41 and 42 of the International Nice Classification and on an international registration of a trademark <span>BOURSOBANK No.1757984 registered from 28 August, 2023 for <\/span>goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 41 of the International Nice Classification.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "gestion-bourso.contact": "TRANSFERRED"
    }
}