Founded in 2011 as a customer-service focused online retailer for pet supplies. The Complainant operates one of the largest online retail stores in the United States. The Complainant provides pet supplies and pet wellness-related services through its online retail store, including pet food, treats, supplies, and veterinary pharmaceutical products and services. The Complainant was ranked in the Fortune 500 which lists the world’s most important companies. In 2024, the Complainant earned almost $12 billion in net sales.<\/p>\n
<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
Language of the Proceeding<\/strong><\/p>\n The language of the Registration Agreement for the disputed domain name is Chinese. Pursuant to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules“)<\/span>, paragraph 11(a), in the absence of an agreement between the parties, or unless specified otherwise in the registration agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement.<\/p>\n The Complaint was filed in English. The Complainant requested that the language of the proceedings be English as the disputed domain name is in Latin characters, the disputed domain name fully incorporates the Complainant’s English language trademark and the English words “chewy” and “bitesa”, which suggests that the Respondent is able to understand English for the purposes of understanding the Complaint. Further, the Respondent’s website, while it was active, was in the English language. The Complainant would also incur substantial additional expense and delay if the Complaint has to be submitted in English.<\/p>\n The Respondent did not make any submissions with respect to the language of the proceeding. <\/p>\n In exercising its discretion to use a language other than that of the registration agreement, the Panel has to exercise such discretion judicially in the spirit of fairness and justice to both parties, taking into account all relevant circumstances of the case, including matters such as the parties’ ability to understand and use the proposed language, time and costs (see WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.5.1).<\/p>\n Having considered the circumstances of this case including the neutrality of English as a common language between parties, the fact that the disputed domain name consists of Latin characters and fully incorporates the Complainant’s English trademark and the English word “bite” and letter “a”, and the fact that the Complainant would incur significant additional expense and delay if the Complaint was to be translated and submitted in English, the Panel determines under paragraph 11(a) of the Rules that the language of the proceeding shall be English. There does not appear to be any reasons which warrant a delay and additional expense in ordering the Complainant to translate the Complaint.<\/p>\n Other Procedural Matters<\/strong><\/p>\n The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Rejected",
"panelists": [
"Jonathan Agmon"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2025-10-10 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " The Complainant is the owner of various trademark registrations, including the following:-<\/p>\n CHEWY.COM United States trademark registration 4,346,308 registered on June 4, 2013;<\/p>\n CHEWY United States trademark registration 5,028,009 registered on August 23, 2016;<\/p>\n CHEWY United States trademark registration 5,834,442 registered on August 13, 2019; and<\/p>\n CHEWY European trademark registration 016605834 registered on August 10, 2017.<\/p>\n The Complainant owns and operates its official domain names at <chewy.com> registered on April 18, 2024.<\/p>\n The disputed domain name was registered on August 8, 2025, and at the time of filing the Complaint, resolved to an inactive website.<\/p>\n The Respondent is Yang Yang Wang, Fujian, China 352264.<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"chewybitesa.com": "REJECTED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}