{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107870",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-08-22 08:02:28",
    "domain_names": [
        "paysend.site"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "PaySend Group Limited "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "Igor Motsnyi (Motsnyi IP Group (dba Motsnyi Legal))",
    "respondent": [
        "Anonymized representative "
    ],
    "respondent_representative": "Anonymized Reprezentative respondent ",
    "factual_background": "<p><strong>FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant owns valid trademark registrations for &ldquo;PAYSEND&rdquo;, &ldquo;PAYSEND Money for the future&rdquo;, and \"PAYSEND LIBRE\", dating from 2015, 2020, and 2023 respectively, covering various software products and financial services (see above the &ldquo;Trademarks&rdquo;).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant is a British FinTech company with an international reach, serving over ten million customers in more than 170 countries. It has launched various financial products and services, including online money transfers and card-to-card transfers, such as &ldquo;Paysend Global Account&rdquo;, &ldquo;Paysend Connect&rdquo;, &ldquo;Paysend Business&rdquo; and &ldquo;Paysend Libre&rdquo;.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;paysend.site&gt; was registered on August 12, 2025, several years after the registration of the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademarks. The corresponding website impersonates the Complainant and imitates its website, including by using its logo. The website collects personal information of visitors, claiming this is necessary because \"<em>Paysend is a regulated financial institution and must follow financial regulations<\/em>\".<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant argues that the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to its registered Trademarks. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The disputed domain name reproduces the Trademarks in full and the associated website hosts content that impersonates the Complainant. The Complainant further alleges that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name in bad faith, with actual knowledge of the Complainant&rsquo;s Trademarks, in an attempt to impersonate the Complainant. The Complainant concludes that the Respondent has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to its website or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant&rsquo;s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the Respondent&rsquo;s website or location or of a product or service on the Respondent&rsquo;s website or location. The Complainant requests transfer of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Bart Van Besien"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-10-15 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant submitted evidence that it is the owner of the following trademarks (hereafter the &ldquo;Trademarks&rdquo;).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>International trademark No.1284999 &ldquo;PAYSEND&rdquo; (word + device), registered on October 13, 2015, for various jurisdictions including Switzerland, covering goods in class 9 and services in class 36;<\/li>\n<li>International trademark No.1251936 &ldquo;PAYSEND&rdquo; (word), registered on April 10, 2015, for various jurisdictions including Switzerland, covering services in class 36;<\/li>\n<li>International trademark No. 1539382 &ldquo;PAYSEND Money for the future&rdquo; (word + device), registered on May 30, 2020, for various jurisdictions including Switzerland, covering goods in class 9 and services in class 36; and<\/li>\n<li>International trademark No. 1735950 \"PAYSEND LIBRE\" (word), registered on February 23, 2023, for various jurisdictions including Switzerland, covering goods in class 9 and services in class 36.<\/li>\n<\/ul>",
    "decision_domains": [],
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}