{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107966",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-09-23 09:30:17",
    "domain_names": [
        "acelorx.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "ARCELORMITTAL"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Meriel'  Peterich"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant states that it is the largest steel producing company in the world and that it is the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant adds that it holds sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and operates extensive distribution networks.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant points out that it is the owner of the international trademark \"ARCELOR\", registered before the registration of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant submits that it owns an important domain names portfolio, including the domain name &lt;arcelor.com&gt; registered since August 29, 2001.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant considers that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar to its trademark \"ARCELOR\", because the slight difference between the Complainant's trademark and the disputed domain name does not change the overall impression of the designation as being connected to the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark and it does not prevent the likelihood of confusion between the disputed domain name and the Complainant and its trademarks.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant adds that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name and it is not related in any way with the Complainant.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not commonly known as the disputed domain name, because it is not identified in the Whois database as the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant clarifies that it does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant underlines that neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Complainant&rsquo;s trademark \"ARCELOR\", or apply for registration of the disputed domain name.<br \/>The Complainant notes that the disputed domain name redirects to a \"coming soon\" page.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant contends that the Respondent did not make any use of the disputed domain name since its registration and that the Respondent has no demonstrable plan to use it.<br \/>Therefore, the Complainant considers that the Respondent has no right or legitimate interest in respect of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant observes that past panels have confirmed the notoriety of the widely known trademark \"ARCELOR\".<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant points out that, given the distinctiveness of the Complainant's trademarks and the Complainant's reputation, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The Complainant underlines that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity in respect of the disputed domain name, and considers that it is not possible to conceive any plausible actual or contemplated use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the Complainant considers that the Respondent has registered the disputed domain name and is using it in bad faith.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p><span>The Complainant, relying on the arguments summarised above, contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/span><br \/><span>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/span><\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Michele Antonini"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-10-19 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant is the registrant of the international trademark registration No. 778212, &ldquo;ARCELOR&rdquo;, registered on February 25, 2002, for goods and services in classes 1, 6, 7, 9, 12, 37, 40 and 42.<\/p>\n<p><br \/>The disputed domain name was registered by the Respondent on September 13, 2025.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "acelorx.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}