{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107908",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-09-15 13:22:43",
    "domain_names": [
        "sìemens.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "Siemens Trademark GmbH & Co. KG"
    ],
    "complainant_representative": null,
    "respondent": [
        "Arjun Garg"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Complainant is<span>&nbsp;<\/span><span>Siemens Trademark GmbH &amp; Co. KG, a trademark holding company, licensing the trademarks at issue within Siemens Group. The Complainant is a subsidiary of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft (AG), which is the ultimate mother company of the Siemens Group. the Siemens Group is one of the world&rsquo;s largest corporations, providing innovative technologies and comprehensive know-how to benefit customers in 190 countries. Founded more than 175 years ago, the company is active in many fields, such as Automation and Control, Power, Transportation, Logistics, Information and Communications, Medical Technology etc.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span>The Complainant provides information on its services online <em>inter alia<\/em> at &lt;siemens.com&gt; and owns numerous domain names with its Trademark.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;s&igrave;emens.com&gt; was registered on December 6, 2024, and is currently not used in connection with an active website. However, the disputed domain name has been used in the form of email addresses, impersonating an alleged Siemens talent acquisition specialist.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>COMPLAINANT:<\/p>\n<p><span>The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name is almost identical to the Trademark.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span>Furthermore, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. In this regard, the Complainant states that the Respondent is not commonly known by the disputed domain name, that it is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way, that the Complainant does not carry out any activity for, nor has any business with the Respondent, and that neither license nor authorization has been granted to the Respondent to make any use of the Trademark or apply for registration of the disputed domain name by the Complainant.<\/span><br \/><br \/><span>Finally, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith. It contends that the Respondent must have been aware of the Complainant and its famous Trademark at the time of registration of the disputed domain name and <\/span><span>that the Respondent's passive holding of the disputed domain name as well as its engagement in fraudulent activities via the related email addresses are evidence of bad faith.<\/span><span><\/span><span><\/span><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Stefanie Efstathiou LL.M. mult."
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-10-20 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant owns several trademarks across various jurisdictions, including the International trademark registration No. 637074 &ldquo;<strong>SIEMENS<\/strong>&rdquo; registered since March 31, 1995&nbsp;(hereinafter collectively referred to as the \"Trademark\").<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "sìemens.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}