{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107948", "time_of_filling": "2025-09-29 09:37:58", "domain_names": [ "ftmo.world" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Mgr. Petr Topka (FTMO s.r.o.)" ], "complainant_representative": null, "respondent": [ "Victoria Gaunt (MORPHEUSNESS LTD)" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant operates the business under the FTMO brand, offering educational and training services in the area of trading various financial instruments via a simulated environment, which provides customers with an opportunity to test and develop their trading and risk management skills.<\/p>\n

The Complainant operates its business via the website presented on the domain name <ftmo.com>. The Complainant has provided proof of the ownership of various trademark registrations in particular in the EU, the USA or Australia. <\/p>\n

The disputed domain name was registered on 22 March 2025 and is providing an active webpage presenting a copy of the Complainant’s official website.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it. <\/span><\/p>\n

The Complainant makes a number of legal arguments and also supplies a set of annexes providing evidence of its activities and of the Respondent's webpage as a mere copy of the Complainant's website.<\/span><\/p>\n

No administratively compliant Response has been filed by the Respondent.<\/span><\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "David-Irving Tayer" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-11-05 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant states, and provides documentation in support thereof, that it is the owner of the following trademarks:<\/p>\n