FACTS ASSERTED BY THE COMPLAINANT AND NOT CONTESTED BY THE RESPONDENT:<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Complainant is incorporated as ARKEMA FRANCE since 2004 and is present in 55 countries throughout the world with 157 production plants; over 21.150 employees word for the Complainant, its sales are approximately € 9.5 billion. The Complainant is a world leader of materials science offering a wide range of products for various domains such as Paints, Adhesives, Coats, Glue, Fiber, Resins, Rought materials and Finished materials for both general industry and consumer goods. The Complainant is producing, reselling and distributing such materials. Complainant is also a leader in the research and development of such elements. In addition, through substantial financial, material and human investments, the Complainant has developed a large clientele relating to Arkema brands, which have achieved a reputation and a certain fame in its field, chemistry.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The website under the disputed domain name resolves to an inaccessible webpage and has been configured to operate an email server which was used to send fraudulent emails, containing wrong invoices to be paid, replicating email addresses of employees of the Complainant with the disputed domain name ending.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name was registered on June 24, 2025.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The Complainant, inter alia, contends that the domain name contains in its entirety Complainant´s mark ARCEMA. The Respondent has no legitimate interest in the domain name in question, since he bears another name and was never authorised or licensed to use the trademark of the Complainant. The domain name in question has been both acquired and is being used in bad faith as the Complainant was known already at the time of the registration of the disputed domain name and the deliberate addition of the letter “r” demonstrates a clear case of typosquatting. The use of the disputed domain name as an email server and the sending of fraudulent emails is an additional indications of bad faith.<\/p>\n
The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Dietrich Beier" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-11-11 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant owns several trademarks for ARKEMA in several countries among them the European Union trademark ARKEMA n° 004181731 in classes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 25, 27, 35, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42 <\/span>registered since February 9, 2006, and in effect. <\/span><\/p>", "decision_domains": { "arkemar.com": "TRANSFERRED" }, "panelist": null, "panellists_text": null }