The Complainant, Deutsche Börse AG., is one of the leading market place organizers for financial services, particularly trading in shares and other securities worldwide. The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of numerous trademark registrations for the marks \"EUREX\".<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name was registered on 6 August 2005 and resolves to an error page at the time or drafting of the present Decision. The disputed domain name used to resolve to an active website bearing the Complainant's marks. <\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
COMPLAINANT<\/strong><\/p>\n The disputed domain name is confusingly similar to the Complainant’s trademark EUREX and its domain names. The Complainant contends that the disputed domain name exactly reproduces the well-known trademark “EUREX”, with the mere addition of the prefix “ex” which relates to currency exchange, and the suffix “trade” with obvious references to the Complainant’s financial activity.<\/p>\n Per the Complaint, the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name. The Complainant contends that Respondent is not affiliated with nor authorized by the Complainant in any way and that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. The Respondent does not use the domain name for legitimate or non-commercial fair use, per the Complainant. Indeed, the disputed domain name was used, at the time of submission of the Complaint, in connection with a website impersonating the Complainant.<\/p>\n As regards the bad faith of the Respondent, the disputed domain name includes the distinctive trademarks EUREX. It is reasonable to infer that the Respondent has registered the domain name with full knowledge of the Complainant's trademark.<\/p>\n Furthermore, the Complainant argues that the Respondent intentionally attempted to divert Internet users by creating a likelihood of confusion, and that the Respondent primarily intended to disrupt the Complainant’s business by registering the disputed domain name. The Complainant further submits that the main purpose of the Respondent was to use the website associated with the disputed domain name, to defraud Internet users by impersonating the Complainant. Additional arguments from the Complainant refer to material copied from the website of the Japanese company BitBank Inc, a third party to this proceeding.<\/p>\n RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/p>\n NO ADMINISTRATIVELY COMPLIANT RESPONSE HAS BEEN FILED<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Arthur Fouré"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2025-11-18 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " The Complainant has provided evidence of ownership of the several EUREX trademarks, including the following:<\/p>\n\n