{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-107996", "time_of_filling": "2025-10-21 11:03:06", "domain_names": [ "coffeematestore.com" ], "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Société des Produits Nestlé S.A." ], "complainant_representative": null, "respondent": [ "ceping li" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant in this case, Société des Produits Nestlé S.A., is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nestlé S.A., the main operating company in the Nestlé Group founded by Henri Nestlé in 1866. The Complainant owns the majority of the trademarks held by the Nestlé Group.<\/p>\n

The Nestlé Group is active in the sale of food products and related services worldwide, with the largest product categories including coffee and beverages, pet food, confectionery, baby foods, bottled water, dairy products and breakfast cereals. The Nestlé Group markets its products in 190 countries, has about 275 000 employees worldwide, and has a physical presence in 80 countries.<\/p>\n

The Complainant is the owner of numerous registered trademarks, including the abovementioned COFFEE MATE trademarks which it uses in connection with the sale of i.a. coffee creamers and coffee-based beverages.<\/p>\n

The disputed domain name <coffeematestore.com> was registered on April 10, 2025. The disputed domain name appears to resolve to a website displaying products of the Complainant under the Complainant’s COFFEE MATE mark.<\/p>\n

On July 21, 2025, the Complainant’s representative sent a message to the email address indicated on the disputed domain name’s landing site, claiming that the disputed domain name and associated website infringe the Complainant’s rights. Apparently, no response was received.<\/span><\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Flip Petillion (Presiding Panelist)" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-11-28 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant invokes various trademarks including the following:<\/p>\n