The Complainant is one of the top European asset managers based on assets under management and has offices in Europe, the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle East and the Americas. With over 100 million retail, institutional and corporate clients, the Complainant ranks in the global top 10.<\/p>\n
The disputed domain name <mail-amundi.com> was registered on October 14, 2025 and resolves to a parking page. Mail exchange (\"MX records\") is set up for the disputed domain name. Mail exchanges<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n
In particular, the Complainant contends that the disputed domain name <mail-amundi.com> is confusingly similar to its AMUNDI mark as it incorporates it in its entirety and the addition of the term “mail” is not sufficient to avoid a likelihood of confusion. <\/p>\n
The Complainant further maintains that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain name. The Complainant is required to make out a prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests. Once such a prima facie case is made, the Respondent carries the burden of demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. If the Respondent fails to do so, the Complainant is deemed to have satisfied paragraph 4(a) (ii) of the UDRP.<\/p>\n
The Complainant asserts that the Respondent is not known by the disputed domain name. Furthermore, the Respondent is not affiliated with the Complainant’s business in any way and has not been authorized to use the Complainant’s AMUNDI mark in any manner. The disputed domain name redirects to a parking page. According to the Complainant, the Respondent has not used the disputed domain name, and has no demonstrable plans to do so. The lack of content on the disputed domain name demonstrates a lack of a bona fide offering of goods or services or legitimate noncommercial or fair use.<\/p>\n
Lastly, the Complainant contends that the Respondent has registered and is using the disputed domain name in bad faith. the Complainant also asserts that its AMUNDI mark is distinctive and has a reputation. Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that the Respondent registered the domain name with knowledge of the Complainant's mark. Moreover, the disputed domain name resolves to a parking page. The Complainant contends that the Respondent has not demonstrated any activity with respect to the disputed domain name, and that it is not possible to conceive any plausible actual or contemplated active use of the disputed domain name by the Respondent that would not be illegitimate. Incorporating a famous mark into a domain name, coupled with an inactive website, may be evidence of bad faith registration and use. Furthermore, the Respondent has configured MX records for the disputed domain name, suggesting that it may be used for email purposes.<\/p>\n
The Respondent did not file any administratively compliant Response.<\/p>", "rights": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "
The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "
The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "Angelica Lodigiani (Presiding Panelist)" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-11-29 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "
The Complainant is the owner of the international trademark n°1024160 AMUNDI (word), registered on September 24, 2009 for various types of financial services in class 36 in various jurisdictions, including in the United States of America (\"United States\").<\/p>\n
The Complainant also owns the domain name <amundi.com>, registered on August 26, 2004 and used to resolve to its official website.<\/p>", "decision_domains": { "mail-amundi.com": "TRANSFERRED" } }