{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108118", "time_of_filling": "2025-11-10 09:19:53", "domain_names": [ "burberryssale.com", "burberrysale.shop " ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Burberry Limited " ], "complainant_representative": "Coöperatie SNB-REACT U.A.", "respondent": [ "Liana De" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant is global luxury brand involved in the design, manufacture, advertising, distribution, and sale of high-quality apparel, bags, cosmetics, perfumes and accessories. Established in 1856 in England, the Complainant has continuously used the BURBERRY mark in connection with its goods and services. The Complainant currently operates over 400 retail and concession outlets around the world, and its products are also sold in well-known department stores, boutiques, Burberry stores, online at www.burberry.com<\/a>, and other authorized retail establishments. In the 2024 fiscal year, the Complainant had over £2,461 million in revenue.<\/p>\n

The Complainant states that it has spent substantial resources in advertising and promoting its BURBERRY trade mark, and as a result, the BURBERRY mark has become internationally famous and has acquired enormous and valuable goodwill, and is considered one of the most valuable fashion brands worldwide.<\/p>\n

The Respondent registered the <burberryssale.com> domain name on July 1, 2025, and the <burberrysale.shop> domain name on June 30, 2025. At the time of filing the Complaint, the disputed domain names resolved to inactive webpages. The disputed domain names previously resolved to websites that impersonated the Complainant’s official website, www.burberry.com<\/a>, prominently displayed its BURBERRY trade mark, and sold purportedly BURBERRY-branded products. At the time of filing the Complaint, the disputed domain names resolved to inactive websites.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain names.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.
No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names are confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

Language of the Proceeding<\/strong><\/p>\n

The language of the Registration Agreement for the disputed domain names is Chinese.  Pursuant to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules“)<\/span>, paragraph 11(a), in the absence of an agreement between the parties, or unless specified otherwise in the registration agreement, the language of the administrative proceeding shall be the language of the registration agreement.<\/p>\n

The Complaint was filed in English. The Complainant requested that the language of the proceedings be English for these reasons:<\/p>\n