{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108150",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-11-14 10:25:55",
    "domain_names": [
        "ca-languedoc.online"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "  Iveta Špiclová   (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "CREDIT AGRICOLE S.A."
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Henock Feu"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is the leader in retail banking in France and one of the largest banks in Europe. First financing the French economy and major European player, Complainant assists its clients' projects in France and around the world, in all areas of banking and trades associated with it: insurance management, asset leasing and factoring, consumer credit, corporate and investment. Complainant&rsquo;s regional bank is called CREDIT AGRICOLE DU LANGUEDOC.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name was registered on September 26, 2025 and has been set up with MX records necessary for e-mail purposes.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name resolves to a parking page with commercial links to companies active in the financial area.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer of the disputed domain name. <span class=\"Apple-converted-space\">&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Complainant, inter alia, contends, that the domain name contains in its entirety Complainant&acute;s mark CA and the geographical term &bdquo;Languedoc&ldquo; is not sufficient to escape the finding that the disputed domain name is confusingly similar. The Respondent has no legitimate interest in the domain name in question, since he is not known under the name and was never authorised or licensed to use the trademark of the Complainant. The domain name in question has been both acquired and is being used in bad faith as the Complainant was known already at the time of the registration of the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent did not reply to the Complainant&rsquo;s contentions.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Dietrich Beier"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-12-17 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant owns several trademarks for CA (fig.) in several countries among them the International Registration 933604 in classes 9, 16, 35, 36, 38 and 42 registered since March 23, 2007 and in effect.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "ca-languedoc.online": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}