{ "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108145", "time_of_filling": "2025-11-19 11:14:49", "domain_names": [ "INTESASANPAOLO.STORE" ], "case_administrator": " Iveta Špiclová (Czech Arbitration Court) (Case admin)", "complainant": [ "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A." ], "complainant_representative": "Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A.", "respondent": [ "Justin R" ], "respondent_representative": null, "factual_background": "

The Complainant is a leading Italian banking group resulting from the merger (effective as of January 1, 2007) between Banca Intesa S.p.A. and Sanpaolo IMI S.p.A., two of the top Italian banking groups.<\/span><\/p>\n

It has a network of 3500 branches throughout Italy and has around 13.9 million customers. It also has a presence in Central-Eastern Europe with a network of 900 branches and over 7.5 million customers. Its international network specialised in supporting corporate customers has a presence in 25 countries, including the USA, Russia, China and India.<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "

The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "

The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domains name should be transferred to it. The Complainant makes a number of legal arguments and also supplies a set of annexes providing evidence of its activities and of the Respondent's use of a mere webpage offering to sell the disputed domain.<\/span><\/p>\n

No administratively compliant Response has been filed by the Respondent.<\/span><\/p>", "rights": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>", "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "bad_faith": "

The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>", "procedural_factors": "

It ought to be indicated that the CAC was unable to send the written notice to the Respondent as the address provided by the Registrar in \"Registrar verification\" information does not exist. The CeCACntre nevertheless sent the notice and the postal service provider was not able to deliver a written notice to such address.<\/p>\n

No other address for correspondence was found on the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n

The notice of the Commencement of the administrative proceeding was sent also by e-mail. Yet, the e-mail notices sent to postmaster@intesasanpaolo.store and to justin@pacedomains.com were returned back undelivered for the first address and no proof of receipt for the second one. No further e-mail addresses could be found on the disputed site.<\/p>\n

The Respondent never accessed the online platform.<\/p>\n

The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>", "decision": "Accepted", "panelists": [ "David-Irving Tayer" ], "date_of_panel_decision": "2025-12-25 00:00:00", "informal_english_translation": "

The Complainant is the owner of numerous trademarks filed or registered worldwide, including but not limited to the following:<\/p>\n