{
    "case_number": "CAC-UDRP-108274",
    "time_of_filling": "2025-12-22 10:28:21",
    "domain_names": [
        "spiebatignollessas.com"
    ],
    "case_administrator": "Olga Dvořáková (Case admin)",
    "complainant": [
        "SPIE BATIGNOLLES "
    ],
    "complainant_representative": "NAMESHIELD S.A.S.",
    "respondent": [
        "Monique Brunt"
    ],
    "respondent_representative": null,
    "factual_background": "<p>The Complainant is SPIE BATIGNOLLES, a leading French group active in the building and infrastructure construction sector in numerous countries, including the United Kingdom. In 2024, its turnover amounted to EUR 2,582 million. Through extensive and long-standing use of the SPIE BATIGNOLLES Trademark in connection with engineering and construction goods and services, the Complainant has acquired a significant degree of recognition for this mark in the relevant industry worldwide.<\/p>\n<p>The Respondent is an individual residing in the United Kingdom.<\/p>\n<p>The disputed domain name &lt;spiebatignollessas.com&gt; was registered on 17 December 2025 and does not resolve to an active website. However, MX records have been configured for the disputed domain name.<\/p>\n<p>The factual assertions made by the Complainant have not been contested by the Respondent.<\/p>",
    "other_legal_proceedings": "<p>The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings which are pending or decided and which relate to the disputed domain name.<\/p>",
    "no_response_filed": "<p>The Complainant contends that the requirements of the Policy have been met and that the disputed domain name should be transferred to it.<\/p>\n<p>No administratively compliant Response has been filed.<\/p>",
    "rights": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "bad_faith": "<p>The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy).<\/p>",
    "procedural_factors": "<p>The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
    "decision": "Accepted",
    "panelists": [
        "Ivett Paulovics"
    ],
    "date_of_panel_decision": "2026-01-13 00:00:00",
    "informal_english_translation": "<p>The Complainant, conducting business under the company \/ trade name SPIE BATIGNOLLES, owns numerous trademarks including the wording \"SPIE BATIGNOLLES\", such as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>International trademark (figurative) SPIE BATIGNOLLES, Registration No. 535026, registered since 17 February 1989 in Classes 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42;<\/li>\n<li>European Union trademark (figurative) SPIE BATIGNOLLES, Registration No. 003540226, registered since 5 December 2006 in Classes 1, 2, 6, 19, 37, 42;<\/li>\n<li>French trademark (figurative) SPIE BATIGNOLLES, Registration No. 1494661, registered since 7 April 1989 in Classes 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19, 28, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 45.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Furthermore, the Complainant owns multiple domain names consisting in the wording \"SPIE BATIGNOLLES\", such as &lt;spiebatignolles.com&gt; registered since 27 April 2009 and used in relation to its main website.<\/p>\n<p>The above-mentioned rights of the Complainant are hereinafter referred to as the SPIE BATIGNOLLES Trademark.<\/p>",
    "decision_domains": {
        "spiebatignollessas.com": "TRANSFERRED"
    },
    "panelist": null,
    "panellists_text": null
}