Complainant states that it was “established” in 2020 and is “a consumer tech company focusing on desktop 3D printers… [p]rimarily based in Shenzhen, China, with other sites in Shanghai, China, and Austin, Texas, U.S. The Shenzhen company is registered under name of Shen Zhen Tuo Zhu Ke Ji You Xian Gong Si (Shenzhen Tuozhu Technology Co., Ltd.,) and the US company name is Bambulab USA Inc.” Complainant further states that “[o]n 11 November 2022, the most authoritative and informative TIME Magazine highlighted the most impactful new products and ideas and honored the Bambu Lab X1 Series of 3D printers in the year’s Best Inventions”; that “[i]n 2023 and 2024, CNET, a well-respected and trustworthy tech review provider, rated the Bambulab 3D printer as the best in various categories among other models”; and that “[i]n 2025, Both the Bambu Lab H2D 3D printer and the CyberBrick system were included in the ‘Best Inventions of 2025’ list by TIME Magazine.”<\/p>\n
The Disputed Domain Name was created on October 22, 2025, and, according to the Complaint (and as supported by a screenshot included with the Complaint) “is redirected to a sales page at a price of 3439.75 USD.”<\/p>\n
Complainant states that “[o]n 20 November 2025, the representative of the Complainant sent an abuse notice email via the registrar platform to the registrant, but the registrant did not respond.”<\/p>", "other_legal_proceedings": "
The Panel is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are pending or decided and that relate to the Disputed Domain Name.<\/p>", "no_response_filed": "
Complainant contends, in relevant part, as follows:<\/p>\n
Paragraph 4(a)(i): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name is confusingly similar to the BAMBULAB Trademark because “[t]he primary and most distinctive part of the domain name is ‘bambulab’, which is exactly the same as the trademark ‘bambulab’”; and “[t]he additional ‘i’ infront [sic] does not significantly alter the visual perception of the core part of the domain name.”<\/p>\n
Paragraph 4(a)(ii): Complainant states that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name because, inter alia<\/em>, “[t]he domain’s registrant is Mechael Nava”; “there is not any relationship between the Respondents and the Complainant”; “the Complainant has not granted the domain registrants any authorization to use the trademark, either online or offline”; and “Complainant was unable to find sufficient evidence or justification that the Respondent met the criteria outlined in paragraph 4(c) under UDRP.”<\/p>\n Paragraph 4(a)(iii): Complainant states that the Disputed Domain Name was registered and is being used in bad faith because, inter alia<\/em>, the Disputed Domain Name was registered “much later than the Complainant’s business establishment and trademark registration”; “[c]onsidering the distinguished reputation of the Bambulab brand in the world since 2022, especially among people who are interested in technology, it is difficult to assume that the registrants did not know the Complainant’s business name ‘Bambulab’ as well as the 3D printer brand and randomly selected the domain name to register”; “[e]specially in the US, where the Respondent lives and the Time Magazine pubulishes [sic]”; “[t]he disputed domain name was registered on October 22, 2025” and “[b]y November 20, it was found redirecting to a website listing the domain for sale at a significantly inflated price”; “[t]herefore, the Complainant concludes that the Respondent’s purpose in registering the domain name was not for bona fide use, but rather for illicit commercial benefit.”<\/p>\n No administratively compliant response has been filed.<\/p>",
"rights": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
"no_rights_or_legitimate_interests": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Respondent to have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the Disputed Domain Name (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
"bad_faith": " The Complainant has, to the satisfaction of the Panel, shown the Disputed Domain Name has been registered and is being used in bad faith (within the meaning of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the UDRP).<\/p>",
"procedural_factors": " The Panel is satisfied that all procedural requirements under UDRP were met and there is no other reason why it would be inappropriate to provide a decision.<\/p>",
"decision": "Accepted",
"panelists": [
"Douglas Isenberg"
],
"date_of_panel_decision": "2026-01-14 00:00:00",
"informal_english_translation": " Complainant states (and provides documentation in support thereof) that it is the owner of the following trademark registrations, among others: EU Reg. No. 018584524 for BAMBULAB (registered February 15, 2022); U.S. Reg. No. 7,044,602 for BAMBULAB (registered May 2, 2023); and UK Reg. No. 3712903 for BAMBULAB (registered January 14, 2022). These registrations are referred to herein as the “BAMBULAB Trademark.”<\/p>",
"decision_domains": {
"ibambulab.com": "TRANSFERRED"
},
"panelist": null,
"panellists_text": null
}